This paper concerns the optimization of casing grooves and the important influence of stall inception mechanism on groove performance. Installing casing grooves is a well known technique for improving the stable operating range of a compressor, but the wide-spread use of grooves is restricted by the loss of efficiency and flow capacity. In this paper, laboratory tests are used to examine the conditions under which casing treatment can be used to greatest effect. The use of a single casing groove was investigated in a recently published companion paper. The current work extends this to multiple-groove treatments and considers their performance in relation to stall inception mechanisms. Here it is shown that the stall margin gain from multiple grooves is less than the sum of the gains if the grooves were used individually. By contrast, the loss of efficiency is additive as the number of grooves increases. It is then shown that casing grooves give the greatest stall margin improvement when used in a compressor, that exhibits spike-type stall inception, while modal activity before stall can dramatically reduce the effectiveness of the grooves. This finding highlights the importance of being able to predict which stall inception mechanism might occur in a given compressor before and after grooves are added. Some published prediction techniques are therefore examined, but found wanting. Lastly, it is shown that casing grooves can, in some cases, be used to remove rotor blades and produce a more efficient, stable, and light-weight rotor.

1.
Hathaway
,
M. D.
, 2007, “
Passive Endwall Treatments for Enhancing Stability
,”
NASA
Report No. TM-2007-214409.
2.
Osborn
,
W. M.
,
Lewis
,
G. W.
, and
Heidelberg
,
L. J.
, 1971, “
Effect of Several Porous Casing Treatments on Stall Limit and Overall Performance of an Axial Compressor Rotor
,”
NASA
Report No. TN 6537.
3.
Gelmedov
,
F. S.
,
Lokshtanov
,
E. A.
,
Olstain
,
L. E. M.
, and
Sigorkin
,
M. A.
, 1998, “
Anti-Stall Tip Treatment Means
,” Patent No. WO 94/20759.
4.
Seitz
,
P. A.
, 1999, “
Casing Treatment for Axial Flow Compressors
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
5.
Prince
,
D. C.
,
Wisler
,
D. C.
, and
Hilvers
,
D. E.
, 1974, “
Study of Casing Treatment Stall Margin Improvement Phenomena
,”
NASA
Report No. CR-134552.
6.
Wilke
,
I.
, and
Kau
,
H. -P.
, 2004, “
A Numerical Investigation of the Flow Mechanisms in a High-Pressure Compressor Front Stage With Axial Slots
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
(
3
), p.
339
.
7.
Fujita
,
H.
, and
Takata
,
H.
, 1984, “
A Study on Configurations of Casing Treatment for Axial Flow Compressors
,”
The Bulletin of the JSME
0021-3764,
27
(
230
), pp.
1675
1681
.
8.
Houghton
,
T. O.
, and
Day
,
I. J.
, 2011, “
Enhancing the Stability of Subsonic Compressors Using Casing Grooves
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
133
(
2
), p.
021007
.
9.
Day
,
I. J.
, 1993, “
Stall Inception in Axial Flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
(
1
), pp.
1
.
10.
Camp
,
T. R.
, and
Day
,
I. J.
, 1998, “
A Study of Spike and Modal Stall Phenomena in a Low-Speed Axial Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
120
(
3
), pp.
393
401
.
11.
Dobrzynski
,
B.
,
Saathoff
,
H.
, and
Kosyna
,
G.
, 2007, “
Influence of the Rotor Tip Stagger Angle on Axial Compressor Stall Inception
,”
Seventh ETC
, Athens, Greece.
12.
McDougall
,
N. M.
,
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, and
Hynes
,
T. P.
, 1990, “
Stall Inception in Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
112
(
1
), p.
116
.
13.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
Nikkanen
,
J. P.
,
Haddad
,
D. E.
,
Mazzawy
,
R. S.
, and
Joslyn
,
H. D.
, 1979, “
A Fundamental Criterion for the Application of Rotor Casing Treatment
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
101
(
2
), p.
237
.
14.
Simpson
,
A. K.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
, 2007, “
An Experimental Study of the Inception of Rotating Stall in a Single-Stage Low-Speed Axial Compressor
,”
ASME Turbo Expo
, Montreal, QC.
15.
Schlichting
,
H.
, and
Das
,
A.
, 1969, “
On the Influence of Turbulence Level on the Aerodynamic Losses of Axial Turbomachines
,”
Symposium on Flow Research on Blading
, Baden.
16.
Vo
,
H. D.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Greitzer
,
E. M.
, 2008, “
Criteria for Spike Initiated Stall
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
130
(
1
), p.
011023
.
17.
Houghton
,
T. O.
, 2009, “
Axial Compressor Stability Enhancement
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
18.
Young
,
A.
, 2008, “
Blade Tip Shape and Compressor Stall
,” Cambridge University Report.
19.
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, 1989,
Compressor Aerodynamics
,
Longmans
,
Green, NY
.
20.
Smith
,
L. H.
, 2002, “
Axial Compressor Aerodesign Evolution at General Electric
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
(
3
), p.
321
.
21.
Day
,
I. J.
,
Breuer
,
T.
,
Escuret
,
J.
,
Cherrett
,
M.
, and
Wilson
,
A.
, 1999, “
Stall Inception and the Prospects for Active Control in Four High-Speed Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
121
(
1
), p.
18
.
22.
Hoying
,
D. A.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
,
Vo
,
H. D.
, and
Greitzer
,
E. M.
, 1999, “
Role of Blade Passage Flow Structures in Axial Compressor Rotating Stall Inception
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
121
(
4
), p.
735
.
23.
Yoon
,
Y. S.
,
Song
,
S. J.
, and
Shin
,
H. W.
, 2006, “
Influence of Flow Coefficient, Stagger Angle and Tip Clearance on Tip Vortex in Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
128
, p.
1274
.
You do not currently have access to this content.