In this paper, the effects of axial gap distance between the first stage stator and rotor blades and multiblocking on aerodynamics and performance of partial admission turbines are analyzed numerically. The selected test case is a two stage axial steam turbine with low reaction blades operating with compressed air. The multiblocking effect is studied by blocking the inlet annulus of the turbine in a single arc and in two opposing blocked arcs, each having the same admission degree. The effect of axial gap distance between the first stage stator and rotor blades is studied while varying the axial gap by 20% compared with the design gap distance. Finally, full admission turbine is modeled numerically for comparison. Performance of various computational cases showed that the first stage efficiency of the two stage partial admission turbine with double blockage was better than that of the single blockage turbine; however, the extra mixing losses of the double blockage turbine caused the efficiency to deteriorate in the downstream stage. It was shown that the two stage partial admission turbine with smaller axial gap than the design value had better efficiency of the first stage due to lower main flow and leakage flow interactions; however, the efficiency at the second stage decreased faster compared with the other cases. Numerical computations showed that the parameters, which increased the axial force of the first stage rotor wheel for the partial admission turbine, were longer blocked arc, single blocked arc, and reduced axial gap distance between the first stage stator and rotor blades.

1.
He
,
L.
, 1997, “
Computation of Unsteady Flow Through Steam Turbine Blade Rows at Partial Admission
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
0957-6509,
211
(
3
), pp.
197
205
.
2.
Lewis
,
K. L.
, 1993, “
The Influence of Partial Admission on the Performance of a Multistage Turbine
,” Whittle Laboratory, Cambridge University, Internal Report.
3.
Skopek
,
J.
,
Vomela
,
J.
,
Tajc
,
L.
, and
Polanski
,
J.
, 1999, “
Partial Steam Admission in an Axial Turbine Stage
,” IMechE Report No. C557/077/99.
4.
Lampart
,
P.
,
Szymaniak
,
M.
, and
Rzadkowski
,
R.
, 2004, “
Unsteady Load of Partial Admission Control Stage Rotor of a Large Power Steam Turbine
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
, Vol.
5A
, pp.
237
246
.
5.
Sakai
,
N.
,
Harada
,
T.
, and
Imai
,
Y.
, 2006, “
Numerical Study of Partial Admission Stages in Steam Turbine: (Efficiency Improvement by Optimizing Admission Arc Position)
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. B
1340-8054,
49
(
2
), pp.
212
217
.
6.
Baagherzadeh Hushmandi
,
N.
,
Fridh
,
J. E.
, and
Fransson
,
T. H.
, 2011, “
Unsteady Forces of Rotor Blades in Full and Partial Admission Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X, in press.
7.
Fridh
,
J. E.
,
Bunkute
,
B.
,
Fakhrai
,
R.
, and
Fransson
,
T. H.
, 2004, “
An Experimental Study on Partial Admission in a Two Stage Axial Air Test Turbine With Numerical Comparisons
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2004
, Vol.
5B
, pp.
1285
1297
.
8.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
The 1993 IGTI Scholar Lecture: Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
You do not currently have access to this content.