After an extended period of operation, the surfaces of turbine airfoils become extremely rough due to deposition, spallation, and erosion. The rough airfoil surfaces will cause film cooling performance degradation due to effects on adiabatic effectiveness and heat transfer coefficients. In this study, the individual and combined effects of roughness upstream and downstream of a row of film cooling holes on the suction side of a turbine vane have been determined. Adiabatic effectiveness and heat transfer coefficients were measured for a range of mainstream turbulence levels and with and without showerhead blowing. Using these parameters, the ultimate film cooling performance was quantified in terms of net heat flux reduction. The dominant effect of roughness was a doubling of the heat transfer coefficients. Maximum adiabatic effectiveness levels were also decreased significantly. Relative to a film cooled smooth surface, a film cooled rough surface was found to increase the heat flux to the surface by 30%–70%.

1.
Bons
,
J. P.
,
Taylor
,
R.
,
McClain
,
S.
, and
Rivir
,
R. B.
, 2001, “
The Many Faces of Turbine Surface Roughness
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
739
748
.
2.
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
Schmidt
,
D. L.
, and
Tabbita
,
M.
, 1998, “
Characterization and Laboratory Simulation of Turbine Airfoil Surface Roughness and Associated Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
120
, pp.
337
342
.
3.
Goldstein
,
R. J.
,
Eckert
,
E. R. G.
,
Chiang
,
H. D.
, and
Elovic
,
E.
, 1985, “
Effect of Surface Roughness on Film Cooling Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
107
, pp.
111
116
.
4.
Schmidt
,
D. L.
,
Sen
,
B.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
, 1996, “
Effects of Surface Roughness on Film Cooling
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-299.
5.
Guo
,
S. M.
,
Lai
,
C. C.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
,
Oldfield
,
M. L. G.
,
Lock
,
G. D.
, and
Rawlinson
,
A. J.
, 2000, “
Influence of Surface Roughness on Heat Transfer and Effectiveness for a Fully Film Cooled Nozzle Guide Vane Measured by Wide Band Liquid Crystals and Direct Heat Flux Gages
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
709
716
.
6.
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
Snook
,
D.
, and
Kohli
,
A.
, 2003, “
Rough Surface Effects on Film Cooling of the Suction Side Surface of a Turbine Vane
,” ASME Paper No. EMECE2003–42061.
7.
Cutbirth
,
J. M.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
, 2002, “
Thermal Field and Flow Visualization Within the Stagnation Region of a Film Cooled Turbine Vane
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
200
206
.
8.
Robertson
,
D. R.
, 2004, “
Roughness Impace on Turbine Vane Suction Side Film Cooling Effectiveness
,” M. S. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
9.
Sen
,
B.
,
Schmidt
,
D. L.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
1996, “
Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, No.
4
, pp.
800
806
.
10.
Rutledge
,
J. L.
, 2004, “
Suction Side Roughness Effects on Film Cooling Heat Transfer on a Turbine Vane
,” M. S. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
You do not currently have access to this content.