Abstract

One of the most vulnerable parts in high-pressure and temperature pipeline networks in steam turbine power plant installations is pipe bends, due to intense fluctuation of velocity and pressure of the superheated steam flowing through the piping bend. On the other hand, because of unique chemical and physical properties, the transportation of superheated steam can adversely effect on the integrity of the pipe bends in the piping network. Therefore, the potential risk of pipeline failure becomes more probable at bends. Therefore, to ensure the survivability of the piping network, thorough investigations of the superheated steam flowing through pipe bends are of great significance in better understanding its flow behavior. However, to predict flow behavior at piping bend, intensive research by direct experiment at high temperature and pressure might not be possible to some extent. In that case, computer codes and models can help us analyze flow behavior of superheated steam at pipe bends. The current work is a computational fluid dynamics investigation, where numerical examination is carried out by commercial code ansys fluent for thermal hydraulic analysis of flow behavior of superheated steam through multiple configurations of 3D angular piping bend: 90 deg, 120 deg, and 135 deg. Validation of credibility of the computational approach is done against Sudo et al.'s experiment. With relatively good agreement between the experiment and numerical result using air flowing through 90 deg elbow, single-phase turbulent flow of superheated steam is examined by the application of realizable turbulence model (k–ɛ). The final assessment of the computed results has been done using qualitative and quantitative analyses. The study reveals that unlike the pressure profiles, the radial velocity profiles at the bend exit are noticeably different from those at the bend inlet, since they exhibit more rounded peaks and gentler velocity gradients. The study also shows that the radial pressure and velocity profiles do not display any sign of the existence of a pair of vortices.

Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

References

1.
Pietrzak
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Flow Patterns and Gas Fractions of Air–Oil and Air–Water Flow in Pipe Bends
,”
Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
,
92
(
9
), pp.
1647
1658
.
2.
Rup
,
K.
, and
Sarna
,
P.
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Turbulent Flow Through a Square-Sectioned Duct With Installed 90-Degree Elbow
,”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
383
391
.
3.
Revankar
,
S. T.
,
2009
, “Heat Transfer and Thermal Hydraulics Analysis,”
Nuclear Engineering Handbook
,
K. D.
Kok
, ed.,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
, pp.
641
713
.
4.
Mao
,
W.
,
Kato
,
M.
,
Liu
,
L.
,
Fukuoka
,
M.
, and
Sakai
,
N.
,
2017
, “
Heat Transfer Analysis of Superheated Steam by Considering the Spraying Flow Rate
,”
J. Food Process. Eng.
,
40
(
2
), p.
e12395
.
5.
Gu
,
H.
,
Cheng
,
L.
,
Huang
,
S.
,
Bo
,
B.
,
Zhou
,
Y.
, and
Xu
,
Z.
,
2015
, “
Thermo-Physical Properties Estimation and Performance Analysis of Superheated-Steam Injection in Horizontal Wells Considering Phase Change
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
99
, pp.
119
131
.
6.
Murray
,
L. R.
, and
Holbert
,
K.
,
2022
,
An Introduction to the Concepts, Systems and Applications of Nuclear Processes
,
Nuclear Energy, Butterworth-Heinemann Press
,
CPI Antony Rowe, Eastbourne, UK
, pp.
325
347
.
7.
Al-Rafai
,
W.
,
Tridimas
,
Y.
, and
Woolley
,
N. H.
,
1990
, “
A Study of Turbulent Flows in Pipe Bends
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
204
(
6
), pp.
399
408
.
8.
Sudo
,
K.
,
Sumida
,
M.
, and
Hibara
,
H.
,
1998
, “
Experimental Investigation on Turbulent Flow in a Circular-Sectioned 90-Degree Bend
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
25
(
1
), pp.
42
49
.
9.
Kolarevic
,
M.
,
Savic
,
L.
,
Kapor
,
R.
, and
Mladenovic
,
N.
,
2014
, “
Supercritical Flow in a Circular Pipe Bends
,”
Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
,
92
(
8
), pp.
1482
1565
.
10.
Dutta
,
P.
, and
Nandi
,
N.
,
2018
, “
Numerical Study on Turbulent Separation Reattachment Flow in Pipe Bends With Different Small Curvature Ratio
,”
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C
,
100
(
6
), pp.
995
1004
.
11.
Kim
,
J.
,
Yadav
,
M.
, and
Kim
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Characteristics of Secondary Flow Induced by 90-Degree Elbow in Pipe Flow
,”
Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid Mech.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
229
239
.
12.
Roldán
,
M. I.
,
Valenzuela
,
L.
, and
Zarza
,
E.
, “
Thermal Analysis of Solar Receiver Pipes With Superheated Steam
,”
Appl. Energy
,
103
, pp.
73
84
.
13.
Qian
,
J.
,
Hou
,
C.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Jin
,
Z.
,
2019
, “
Aerodynamics Analysis of Superheated Steam Flow Through Multi-stage Perforated Plates
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
141
, pp.
48
57
.
14.
Haris
,
P. A.
, and
Ramesh
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Numerical Simulation of Superheated Steam Flow in a Micronozzle
,”
Appl. Mech. Mater.
,
592–594
, pp.
1677
1681
.
15.
Sun
,
F.
,
Yao
,
Y.
, and
Li
,
X.
,
2017
, “
Numerical Simulation of Superheated Steam Flow in Dual-Tubing Wells
,”
J. Pet. Sci. Eng.
,
159
, pp.
68
75
.
16.
ANSYS Inc.
,
2017
,
ANSYS FLUENT, Release 17.1
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
17.
Dinh
,
T. N.
,
Yang
,
Y. Z.
,
Tu
,
J. P.
,
Nourgaliev
,
R. R.
, and
Theofanous
,
T. G.
,
2004
, “
Rayleigh-Bénard Natural Convection Heat Transfer: Pattern Formation, Complexity and Predictability
,”
Proceedings of ICAPP ‘04
,
Pittsburgh, PA
,
June 13–17
, p.
4241
.
You do not currently have access to this content.