Abstract

In this paper, the results of a feasibility analysis are summarized to assess the energy, economic, and environmental benefits of electrification and renewable energy integration for an urban district of Old City, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. First, the energy demand for the district is reduced through the implementation of cost-effective energy efficiency measures (EEMs) appropriate for Philadelphia’s climate. Then, a combination of distributed generation (DG) systems including wind, photovoltaics, and hydropower is evaluated to determine optimized hybrid systems that meet the energy demand of non-electrified and electrified districts. The analysis indicates that the implementation of common and proven EEMs to all the district buildings can reduce its annual energy consumption and CO2 emissions by 13% and 13.8%, respectively. These EEMs are estimated to be cost-effective based on the current electricity price of $0.082/kWh offered by Philadelphia’s utility, Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO). Through cost optimization analysis, a hybrid DG system combining wind and hydropower connected to the grid is found to lower the cost of energy for the non-electrified district to $0.007/kWh, lower than the current PECO rate, with the added benefit to lower carbon emissions by 10%. Moreover, the analysis considered the case of an electrified district which reduces life cycle costs by 3.5%. By implementing electrification and EEMs, the electricity usage decreases by 14% and peak demand by 19.5% as well as CO2 emissions by 18%. Through cost optimization to design a hybrid DG system that can meet energy demands of the electrified district, wind and hydropower connected to the grid is found to achieve a cost of energy of $0.008/kWh and carbon emissions reduction of 34.9%.

References

1.
CDP Worldwide
,
2020
, “
GHG Emission Data Set
,” https://www.cdp.net
2.
Mellino
,
C.
,
2015
, “
96 Cities That Are Quitting Fossil Fuels and Moving Toward 100% Renewable Energy
,” https://www.ecowatch.com
3.
International Energy Agency
,
2017
, “
Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption (% of total)—Country Ranking
,” https://www.iea.org/
4.
Energy Information Administration
,
2011
, “
Total Energy
,” https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/
5.
Andrews
,
K.
,
Cuadra
,
G.
,
Currin
,
L.
,
Day
,
S.
,
Jungers
,
B.
,
LeBlanc
,
B.
,
Odell
,
R.
,
Stein
,
J.
,
Stout
,
T.
, and
Welch
,
C.
,
2020
, “
The electrification framework that benefits customers, the grid, and the planet
,” https://www.esource.com/
6.
Resources for the Future
,
2019
, “
Electrification 101
,” https://www.rff.org/
7.
Energy Information Administration
,
2018
, “
State Profiles and Energy Estimates
,” https://www.eia.gov
8.
City of Philadelphia
,
2017
, “
Greenworks: A Vision for a Sustainable Philadelphia
,” https://www.phila.gov
9.
Sierra Club
,
2019
, “
Philadelphia Commits to 100% Clean, Renewable Energy
.”
10.
Brown
,
S. L.
, and
Bachtel
,
L. A.
,
2019
,
A Decarbonized Economy: Risks and Opportunities
,
American Bar Association
,
Chicago, IL
, https://www.americanbar.org
11.
Wilson
,
E.
,
Christensen
,
C.
,
Horowitz
,
S.
,
Robertson
,
J.
, and
Maguire
,
J.
,
2017
,
Energy Efficiency Potential in the U.S. Single-Family Housing Stock
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
12.
Deason
,
J.
,
Wei
,
M.
,
Leventis
,
G.
,
Smith
,
S.
, and
Schwartz
,
L.
,
2018
,
Electrification of Buildings and Industry in the United States
,
Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory
,
Berkeley, CA
.
13.
Billimoria
,
S.
,
Guccione
,
L.
,
Henchen
,
M.
, and
Louis-Prescott
,
L.
,
2018
,
The Economics of Electrifying Buildings: How Electric Space and Water Heating Supports Decarbonization of Residential Buildings
,
Rocky Mountain Institute
,
Boulder, CO
.
14.
California Energy Commission
,
2016
, “
2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards
,” https://www.energy.ca.gov
15.
TRC Energy Services
,
2016
, “
Palo Alto Electrification Final Report
.”
16.
Willman
,
L.
, and
Krarti
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Optimization of Hybrid Distributed Generation Systems for Rural Communities in Alaska
,”
Distrib. Gener. Altern. Energy J.
,
28
(
2013
), pp.
7
31
. 10.1080/21563306.2013.10750233
17.
Feder
,
D.
,
2004
, “
A Regionally Based Energy End-Use Strategy: Case Studies From Centre County, Pennsylvania
,”
Prof. Geogr.
,
56
(
2004
), pp.
185
200
.
18.
Old City District
,
n.d.
, “
Old City
,” https://www.oldcitydistrict.org
19.
The City of Philadelphia Office of Sustainability
,
n.d.
, “
Philly Building Benchmarking
,” http://visualization.phillybuildingbenchmarking.com/
20.
International Code Council
,
2017
, “
2018 International Energy Conservation Code
,” https://codes.iccsafe.org
21.
PECO Energy Company
,
2020
, “
PECO Price to Compare Effective March 1, 2020
.”
22.
Philadelphia Gas Works
,
2020
, “
Gas Service Tariff
.”
23.
Linhart
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Minimizing Lighting Power Density in Office Rooms Equipped With Anidolic Daylighting Systems
,”
Solar Energy
.
24.
California Energy Commission
,
2016
,
Office Daylighting Potential
,
Heschong Mahone Group
,
Sacramento, CA
.
25.
Direct Energy
. “
Recommended Thermostat Settings
,” https://www.directenergy.com
26.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
,
2017
, “
Energy Codes and Lighting
,” https://www.designlights.org
27.
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
,
n.d.
, “
Savings Project: Insulate Your Water Heater Tank
,” https://www.energy.gov
28.
Yao
,
Y.
, and
Wang
,
L.
,
2010
, “
Energy Analysis on VAV System With Different air-Side Economizers in China
,”
Energy Build.
,
42
(
2010
), pp.
1220
1230
. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.013
29.
Shehabi
,
A.
,
Ganguly
,
S.
,
Traber
,
K.
,
Price
,
H.
,
Horvath
,
A.
,
Nazaroff
,
W.
, and
Gadgil
,
A.
,
2008
,
Energy Implications of Economizer Use in California Data Centers
,
ACEEE
,
Washington, DC
.
30.
Taitem Engineering
,
2018
, “
High-Performance Packaged Terminal Heat Pump Market and Development Research Report
,”
NYSERDA
.
31.
American Society of Heating
.
Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers
, n.d., https://www.ashrae.org/
32.
Environmental Protection Agency
,
n.d.
, Energy Star Products, https://www.energystar.gov/products, Accessed April 14, 2020.
33.
Environmental Protection Agency
,
n.d.
, “
High Efficiency Water Heaters
,” https://www.energystar.gov
34.
New York League of Conservative Voters
,
2019
, “
A New Opportunity to Expand Hydropower in New York
.”
35.
Slaght
,
V.
,
2019
, “
N.J. Water Agency Considers Harnessing Hydropower
,”
NJ.com
.
36.
Guth
,
D. J.
,
2016
,
Ohio Project Takes Advantage of Untapped Hydro Potential
,
Energy News Network
,
Saint Paul, MN
.
37.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
,
n.d.
, “
Hydroelectric Power
,” https://www.dep.pa.gov
38.
EnergyPlus
,
n.d.
, https://energyplus.net/
39.
The University of California, Los Angeles
,
n.d.
, “
Climate Consultant 6.0
,” http://www.energy-design-tools.aud.ucla.edu/climate-consultant
40.
Paish
,
O.
,
2002
, “
Small Hydro Power: Technology and Current Status
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
6
(
2002
), pp.
537
556
. 10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00006-0
41.
United States Geological Survey
,
2020
, “
National Water Information System: Web Interface
,” from https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov
42.
Department of Environmental Protection
,
n.d.
, Energy Resources for State and Local Governments, https://www.epa.gov/statelocalenergy/state-renewable-energy-resources, Accessed April 16, 2020.
43.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
n.d.
, “
PVWatts
,” https://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php
44.
UN-HABITAT
,
2013
, “
Streets as Public Spaces and Drivers of Urban Prosperity
.”
45.
Sullivan
,
R.
, and
Winkelmann
,
F.
,
1998
,
Validation Studies of the DOE-2 Building Energy Simulation Program
,
Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
,
Berkeley, CA
.
46.
EQuest
,
n.d.
, “
Energy Models
,” http://energy-models.com/equest
47.
Insulation Material Corporation
,
n.d.
, “
IMC Price Sheet Material
.”
48.
Wilson North Carolina
,
n.d.
, “
Wilson Energy Usage Calculators
,” https://www.wilsonnc.org
49.
HOMER Energy
,
n.d.
, “
HOMER Pro
,” https://www.homerenergy.com
50.
HOMER Energy
,
n.d.
, “
HOMER Energy
,” https://www.homerenergy.com
51.
Energy Information Administration
,
2020
, “
Capital Cost and Performance Characteristic Estimates for Utility Scale Electric Power Generating Technologies
.”
52.
Environmental Protection Agency
,
2018
, “
Emission Factors
,” https://www.epa.gov
53.
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
,
n.d.
, http://aceee.org/buildings/coml_equp/hpw/hpwhnyes.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.