The work presented in this paper used rigorous 3D flow-field analysis combined with multi-objective constrained shape design optimization for the design of complete blade + bladelet configurations for a three-blade horizontal-axis wind turbine. The fluid flow analysis in this work was performed using Openfoam software. The 3D, steady, incompressible, turbulent flow Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations were solved in the rotating frame of reference for each combination of wind turbine blade and bladelet geometry. The free stream uniform wind speed in all cases was assumed to be 9 m s−1. The three simultaneous design optimization objectives were as follows: (a) maximize the coefficient of power, (b) minimize the coefficient of thrust force, and (c) minimize twisting moment around the blade axis. The bladelet geometry was fully defined by using a small number of parameters. The optimization was carried out by creating a multidimensional response surface for each of the simultaneous objectives. The response surfaces were based on radial basis functions, where the support points were designs analyzed using the high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of the full blade + bladelet geometry. The response surfaces were then coupled to an optimization algorithm in modefrontier software. The predicted values of the objective functions for the optimum designs were then again validated using Openfoam high-fidelity analysis code. Results for a Pareto-optimized bladelet on a given blade indicate that more than 4% increase in the coefficient of power at minimal thrust force penalty is possible at off-design conditions compared to the same wind turbine rotor blade without a bladelet.

References

1.
Gavrilovic
,
N. N.
,
Rasuo
,
B. P.
,
Dulikravich
,
G. S.
, and
Parezanovic
,
V.
,
2015
, “
Commercial Aircraft Performance Improvement By Using Winglets
,”
FME Trans.
,
43
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
2.
Reddy
,
S. R.
,
Sobieczky
,
H.
,
Dulikravich
,
G. S.
, and
Abdoli
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Multi-Element Winglets: Multi-Objective Optimization of Aerodynamic Shapes
,”
AIAA J. Aircraft
,
5
(
4
), pp.
992
1000
.
3.
Bazmi
,
A. A.
, and
Zahedi
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Sustainable Energy Systems: Role of Optimization Modeling Techniques in Power Generation and Supply—A Review
,”
Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev.
,
15
(
8
), pp.
3480
3500
.
4.
Evans
,
A.
,
Strezov
,
V.
, and
Evans
,
T. J.
,
2009
, “
Assessment of Sustainability Indicators for Renewable Energy Technologies
,”
Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev.
,
13
(
5
), pp.
1082
1088
.
5.
Zhao
,
Q.
,
Sheng
,
C.
, and
Afjeh
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of Offshore Upwind Downwind Turbines
,”
J. Aerodyn.
,
2014
, p.
860637
.
6.
Wood
,
S. L.
, and
Deiterding
,
R.
,
2015
, “
A Lattice Boltzmann Method for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Simulation
,”
14th International Conference on Wind Engineering
,
Porto Alegre, Brazil
,
June 21–26
, pp.
1
18
.
7.
Tobin
,
N.
,
Hamed
,
A. M.
, and
Chamorro
,
L. P.
,
2015
, “
An Experimental Study on the Effects of Winglets on the Wake and Performance of a Model Wind Turbine
,”
Energies
,
8
, pp.
11955
11972
.
8.
Gaunaa
,
M.
, and
Johansen
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Determination of the Maximum Aerodynamic Efficiency of Wind Turbine Rotors With Winglets
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
75
, pp.
1
12
.
9.
Gertz
,
D.
,
Johnson
,
D. A.
, and
Swytink-Binnema
,
N.
,
2012
, “
An Evaluation Testbed for Wind Turbine Blade Tip Designs—Winglet Results
,”
Wind Eng.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
389
410
.
10.
Ferrer
,
E.
, and
Munduate
,
X.
,
2007
, “
Wind Turbine Blade Tip Comparison Using CFD
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
75
, pp.
1
10
.
11.
Reddy
,
S. R.
,
Dulikravich
,
G. S.
, and
Sobieczky
,
H.
,
2017
, “
Bladelets-Winglets on Blades of Wind Turbines: A Multiobjective Design Optimization Study
,” International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
(IMECE2017-70220)
,
Tampa, FL
,
Nov. 3–9
.
12.
Zahle
,
F.
,
Sorensen
,
N. N.
,
McWilliam
,
M. K.
, and
Barlas
,
A.
,
2018
, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Surrogate Optimization of Wind Turbine Blade Tip Extension for Maximizing Energy Production
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1037
, p.
042013
.
13.
Vestas
,
1994
, “Vestas V27-225kW,
50 Hz Wind Turbine With Tubular/Lattice Tower Item no.: 941129 Version 1.2.0.24
,”
Vestas,
Aarhus, Denmark
.
14.
Burton
,
T.
,
Sharpe
,
D.
,
Jenkins
,
N.
, and
Bossanyi
,
E.
,
2001
,
Wind Energy
,
John Willey & Sons Book Co.
,
Chichester, England
.
15.
Juretic
,
F.
,
2015
, “
cfMesh User Guide
,” version 1.1,
Creative Fields, Ltd.
,
London
.
16.
Zhao
,
W.
,
Cheng
,
P.
, and
Wan
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Numerical Computation of Aerodynamic Performances of NREL Offshore 5-MW Baseline Wind Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the Eleventh Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium
,
Shanghai, China
,
Oct. 12–16
, pp.
13
18
.
17.
Stergiannis
,
N.
,
Lacor
,
C.
,
Beeck
,
J. V.
, and
Donnelly
,
R.
,
2016
, “
CFD Modelling Approaches Against Single Wind Turbine Wake Measurements Using RANS
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
753
, pp.
1
16
.
18.
Menter
,
F.
,
1994
, “
Two Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
19.
modeFRONTIER
,
2014
, “
Software Package, Ver. 4.5.4
,”
ESTECO
,
Trieste, Italy
.
20.
Colaco
,
M. J.
, and
Dulikravich
,
G. S.
,
2011
, “A Survey of Basic Deterministic, Heuristic and Hybrid Methods for Single-Objective Optimization and Response Surface Generation,”
Thermal Measurements and Inverse Techniques
,
H. R. B.
Orlande
,
O.
Fudym
,
D.
Milet
, and
R.
Cotta
, eds.,
Taylor and Francis
,
Philadelphia, PA
, pp.
355
405
, Chapter 10,
21.
Sobol
,
I. M.
,
1967
, “
Distribution of Points in a Cube and Approximate Evaluations of Integrals
,”
U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Math. Phys.
,
7
, pp.
86
112
.
22.
Deb
,
K.
,
Pratap
,
A.
,
Agarwal
,
S.
, and
Meyarivan
,
T.
,
2002
, “
A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II
,”
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
182
197
.
You do not currently have access to this content.