Heliostat canting (alignment of mirror facets) is known to have a major influence on the optical efficiency of heliostat fields and therefore on the power output of solar tower plants. In recent years several canting concepts were used, mainly on- and off-axis canting. Several new canting concepts, such as stretched-parabolic or target-aligned canting, were proposed in order to improve the performance of heliostats. As solar power plants become economically more attractive, knowledge about the influence of canting becomes more important. In this context, the influence of several factors on the canting method is discussed and optimal canting strategies are described. The considered factors comprise plant power level, heliostat position in the field, heliostat area, receiver dimension, and site latitude. It is concluded that the target-aligned tracking method is superior to all other variants in the majority of cases. As for the standard azimuth-elevation tracking methods, not one of these exhibits a clear advantage. It is only the on-axis method that performs worst in all cases.

1.
Igel
,
E. A.
, and
Hughes
,
R. L.
, 1979, “
Optical Analysis of Solar Facility Heliostats
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
22
, pp.
283
295
.
2.
Kistler
,
B. L.
, 1986, “
A Users Manual for DELSOL3: A Computer Code for Calculating the Optical Performance and Optimal System Design for Solar Thermal Central Receiver Plants
,” Sandia Report No. SAND86-8018.
3.
Jones
,
S.
, 1996, “
A Comparison of On-Axis and Off-Axis Heliostat Alignment Strategies
,” Sandia Report No. SAND96-0566c.
4.
Chavez
,
J. M.
,
Kolb
,
G. J.
, and
Meinecke
,
W.
, 1993,
Second Generation Central Receiver Technologies
,
Müller
,
Karlsruhe, Germany
.
5.
Buck
,
R.
, and
Friedmann
,
S.
, 2006, “
Solar-Assisted Small Solar Tower Trigeneration Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 2006 International Solar Energy Conference
,
Denver, CO
, Jul. 8–13.
6.
Strachan
,
J. W.
, and
Houser
,
R. M.
, 1993, “
Testing and Evaluation of Large-Area Heliostats for Solar Thermal Applications
,” Sandia Report No. SAND92-1381UC-235.
7.
Zaibel
,
R.
,
Dagan
,
E.
,
Karni
,
J.
, and
Ries
,
H.
, 1995, “
An Astigmatic Corrected Target-Aligned Heliostat for High Concentration
,”
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
0927-0248,
37
, pp.
191
202
.
8.
Chen
,
Y. T.
,
Lim
,
B. H.
, and
Lim
,
C. S.
, 2006, “
Off-Axis Aberration Correction Surface in Solar Energy Applications
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
80
, pp.
268
271
.
9.
Leary
,
P. L.
, and
Hankins
,
J. D.
, 1979, “
A User Guide for MIRVAL—A Computer Code for Comparing Designs of Heliostat-Receiver Optics for Central Receiver Solar Power Plants
,” Sandia Report No. SAND77-8280.
10.
Hottel
,
H. C.
, 1976, “
A Simple Model for Estimating the Transmittance of Direct Solar Radiation Through Clear Atmospheres
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
18
, pp.
129
134
.
You do not currently have access to this content.