Heliostat canting (alignment of mirror facets) is known to have a major influence on the optical efficiency of heliostat fields and therefore on the power output of solar tower plants. In recent years several canting concepts were used, mainly on- and off-axis canting. Several new canting concepts, such as stretched-parabolic or target-aligned canting, were proposed in order to improve the performance of heliostats. As solar power plants become economically more attractive, knowledge about the influence of canting becomes more important. In this context, the influence of several factors on the canting method is discussed and optimal canting strategies are described. The considered factors comprise plant power level, heliostat position in the field, heliostat area, receiver dimension, and site latitude. It is concluded that the target-aligned tracking method is superior to all other variants in the majority of cases. As for the standard azimuth-elevation tracking methods, not one of these exhibits a clear advantage. It is only the on-axis method that performs worst in all cases.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2009
Research Papers
Comparison and Optimization of Heliostat Canting Methods
R. Buck,
R. Buck
German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Institute of Technical Thermodynamics
, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
E. Teufel
E. Teufel
German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Institute of Technical Thermodynamics
, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Buck
German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Institute of Technical Thermodynamics
, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
E. Teufel
German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Institute of Technical Thermodynamics
, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, 70569 Stuttgart, GermanyJ. Sol. Energy Eng. Feb 2009, 131(1): 011001 (8 pages)
Published Online: January 6, 2009
Article history
Received:
July 16, 2007
Revised:
March 20, 2008
Published:
January 6, 2009
Citation
Buck, R., and Teufel, E. (January 6, 2009). "Comparison and Optimization of Heliostat Canting Methods." ASME. J. Sol. Energy Eng. February 2009; 131(1): 011001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3027500
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Nonintrusive Optical Approach to Characterize Heliostats in Utility-Scale Power Tower Plants: Camera Position Sensitivity Analysis
J. Sol. Energy Eng (December 2024)
A Solar Air Receiver With Porous Ceramic Structures for Process Heat at Above 1000 °C—Heat Transfer Analysis
J. Sol. Energy Eng (April 2025)
View Factors Approach for Bifacial Photovoltaic Array Modeling: Bifacial Gain Sensitivity Analysis
J. Sol. Energy Eng (April 2025)
Resources, Training, and Education Under the Heliostat Consortium: Industry Gap Analysis and Building a Resource Database
J. Sol. Energy Eng (December 2024)
Related Articles
Low-Cost Inflatable Heliostat for Solar Thermal Powerplants
J. Sol. Energy Eng (August,2002)
Truncation of the Secondary Concentrator (CPC) as Means to Cost Effective Beam-Down System
J. Sol. Energy Eng (August,2010)
Optical Design of a Novel Two-Stage Solar Trough Concentrator Based on Pneumatic Polymeric Structures
J. Sol. Energy Eng (August,2009)
A New Troughlike Nonimaging Solar Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng (February,2002)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
A New Suppression Method of Main Lobe Mirror-Frequency Interference for Missile-Borne Pulse Doppler Radar
International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce, 3rd (IEEC 2011)
Rub and Looseness
Fundamentals of Rotating Machinery Diagnostics
The B. A. C. H. Pattern and Mathematics
International Conference on Future Computer and Communication, 3rd (ICFCC 2011)