This paper presents study results quantifying the benefits of higher voltage, electric power system designs for a typical solar electric propulsion spacecraft Earth orbiting mission. A conceptual power system architecture was defined and design points were generated for several system voltages using state-of-the-art or advanced technologies. A 300-V “direct-drive” architecture was also analyzed to assess the benefits of directly powering the electric thruster from the photovoltaic array without up-conversion. Computational models were exercised to predict the performance and size power system components to meet spacecraft mission requirements. Pertinent space environments were calculated for the mission trajectory and an electron current collection model was developed to estimate photovoltaic array losses due to natural and induced plasma environments. The secondary benefits of power system mass savings for spacecraft propulsion and attitude control systems were also quantified. Results indicate that considerable spacecraft wet mass savings were achieved by the 300-V and 300-V direct-drive architectures.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
solar powered vehicles, electric propulsion, solar cell arrays, aerospace propulsion, photovoltaic power systems, attitude control, space vehicle power plants
Topics:
Design, Electric propulsion, Electrons, Power systems (Machinery), Space vehicles, Solar energy, Solar cell arrays, Plasmas (Ionized gases)
1.
Mason, L. S., and Oleson, S. R., 2000, “Spacecraft Impacts with Advanced Power and Propulsion,” NASA TM-2000-209912, March.
2.
Sarver-Verhey, Timothy, R., et al., 2002, “Solar Electric Propulsion Vehicle Design Study for Cargo Transfer to Earth-Moon L1,” 5th SAE Power Systems Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers, Coral Springs, FL, Octoer 29–31, 2002.
3.
Kerslake, T. W., et al., 2000, “Solar Power System Options for the Radiation and Technology Demonstration Spacecraft,” 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, AIAA-2000-2807, Las Vegas, Nevada, July 24–28. (See also NASA TM-2000-210243.)
4.
Reinhardt
,
K. C.
, et al.,
1998
, “
Space Power Technology in Power Management and Distributions Electronics
,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, Vol. 35, No. 6, November-December.
5.
Jongeward, G. A., et al., 2001, “High Voltage Solar Arrays for a Direct Drive Hall Effect Propulsion System,” paper IEPC-01-327, 28th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Pasadena, CA, October.
6.
Jongeward, G. A., et al., 2002, “Development of a Direct Drive Hall Effect Thruster System,” paper 02PSC-77, SAE Power Systems Conference, Coral Springs, FL, Oct 29–31.
7.
Hoskins, W. A., et al., 2002, “Direct Drive Hall Thruster System Study,” 51st JANNAF Propulsion Meeting, Orlando, FL, November 19–21.
8.
Sackett, L. L., et al., “Solar Electric Geocentric Transfer with Attitude Constraints: Analysis,” NASA CR-134927, Aug 01, 1975.
9.
Dynatherm Website, 2002, http://www.dynatherm-dci.com/lhpcap.htm
10.
Baity, F. W., et al., 1999, “Design of RF Systems for the RTD Mission VASIMR,” ORNL/CP-103576, April 12.
11.
Kurland, R., et al., 2000, “Terra Flexible Blanket Solar Array Deployment, On-Orbit Performance and Future Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Anchorage, AK, Sep 17–22.
12.
Spectrolab Website, 2002, http://www.spectrolab.com/prd/prd.htm
13.
Ehsani, M. and Salim, A., 2000, “Flawless In-orbit Performance of Lockheed Martins’ Premier A2100 Electrical Power Subsystem for Communications Satellites,” AIAA-2000-2809, 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, NV, July 24–28.
14.
Moog Website, 2002, http://www.moog.com/Space/SpacecraftMechanisms/
15.
Jones, P. A., et al., 1993, “A High Specific Power Solar Array For Low To Mid-Power Spacecraft,” Proceedings of the 12th Space Photovoltaic Research and Technology Conference (SPRAT 12), May 01, p. 177–187.
16.
Metcalf, Kenneth J., 1991, “Lunar PMAD Technology Assessment—Draft Report,” contract no. NAS3-25808, Task Order No. 15, Rockwell International Rocketdyne Division, September 24.
17.
Metcalf, Kenneth J., 2002, “Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Model Development—Final Report,” contract no. NAS3-01140, Order No. C-77988-T, Boeing Corp. Rocketdyne Division, May 13.
18.
Eagle Picher Website, 2002, http://www.epi-tech.com/index.htm
19.
AEA Technology Website, 2002, http://www.aeat-space.com/prodsys/subdivisions-div/SPBAT1.html
20.
Chetty, P. R. K., et al., 1991, “TOPEX Electrical Power System,” 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, August 4–9, 1991.
21.
Hosken R. W., and Wertz, J. R., 2002, “Microcosm Autonomous Navigation System On-Orbit Operation,” http://www.smad.com/analysis/mans1.
22.
Jenkin, A. B., “Attitude Maneuvers of a Solar-Powered Electric Orbital Transfer Vehicle,” AAS PAPER 91-481, Jan 01.
23.
Wertz, J. R. and Larson, W. J., 1999, Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd Ed., Microcosm Press, Torrance, CA and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, Sec. 11-1.
24.
Jordan, C. E., 1989, “NASA Radiation Belt Models AP-8 and AE-8,” Report AD-A223660, Sep 30.
25.
Cour-Palais, B. G., 1969, “Meteoroid Environment Model-1969 (Near Earth to Lunar Surface),” NASA SP 8013.
26.
Kessler, D. J., et al., 1989, “Orbital Debris Environment for Spacecraft Designed to Operate in Low Earth Orbit,” NASA TM 100471.
27.
Kessler, D. J., et al., 1996, “A Computer-Based Orbital Debris Model for Spacecraft Designs and Observations in Low-Earth Orbit,” NASA TM 104825.
28.
Eichelberger, R. J., and Kineke, J. H., Jr., 1967, “Hypervelocity Impact,” SPRINGER-VERLAG, Jan 1, p. 659–692.
29.
Myre, C. A., 1991, “Hypervelocity Particle Impact Testing of Solar Array Coupons,” Preliminary Information Report #259, NASA Lewis Research Center, May 30.
30.
Laframboise
,
J. G.
and
Parker
,
L. W.
,
1973
, “
Probe Design for Orbit-Limited Current Collection
,”
Phys. Fluids
, Vol.
16
, No.
5
, p.
629
–
636
.
31.
Mikellides, Ioannis G., 2002, Science Applications International Corp., personal communication, December.
32.
Smith, R. E. and West, G. S., compilers, 1983, “Space and Planetary Environment Criteria for Use in Space Vehicle Development, 1982 Revision (Volume 1),” NASA TM-82478.
33.
Anon., 1991, “Space Station Ionizing Radiation Emission and Susceptibility Requirements for Ionizing Radiation Environment Compatibility,” SSP30512.
34.
Gallimore, A. D., et al., 2001, “Experimental Investigations with a 5-kW-Class Laboratory Model Closed-Drifted Hall Thruster,” AFRL-SR-BL-TR-01-0069, Jan 01.
35.
Myers, R. M., and Manzella, D. H., 1994, “Stationary Plasma Thruster Plume Characteristics,” NASA-CR-194454, Feb 01.
36.
Anspaugh, B. E., 1996, “GaAs Solar Cell Radiation Handbook,” NASA-CR-203421, Jul 01.
37.
Gaddy, E. M., 1995, “Cost Trade Between Multi-Junction, Gallium Arsenide, and Silicon Solar Cells,” Proceedings of the Space Photovoltaic Research and Technology Conference (SPRAT XIV), NASA CP-3324, Cleveland, OH, Oct 24–26, p. 40–46.
38.
Marvin, D. C., 2000, “Assessment of Multijunction Solar Cell Performance in Radiation Environments,” Aerospace Report #TOR-2000(1210)-1, US Air Force Research Laboratory contract F04701-93-C-0094, Feb 29.
39.
Button, Robert M., 2003, NASA Glenn Research Center, personal communication, February.
40.
Button, Robert M., 1998, “A Modular PMAD System for Small Spacecraft,” NASA TM-1998-206628, January.
41.
Dalton, P., and Cohen, F., 2002, “International Space Station Nickel-Hydrogen Battery On-orbit Performance,” NASA TM-2002-21172, July.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.