In pressure vessel applications, the accurate evaluation of the state of stress in the vicinity of nozzles or rigid attachments is of vital importance to the structural integrity of the vessel. Consequently, a number of investigations have paid attention to the problem and, through analytical and numerical approaches, provided information concerning the effect of system parameters, such as shell curvature and attachment geometry, on stress concentration and effective shell stiffness. While analytical solutions have only been able to provide information to axisymmetric problems, finite element approaches have been widely used as an attractive alternative. In evaluating the latter, one can identify the high computational cost that accompanies analyses dealing with complex systems. In this study, the performance of a boundary integral scheme is assessed as a possible analytical and/or numerical tool in dealing with spherical shells interacting with attachments. Such method hopes to achieve a close to analytical solutions representation of the stress state in the vicinity of the attachment that is accompanied by significant reduction in the computational cost. To achieve this, a set of integral equations, which satisfy the edge constraints, are reduced to a system of algebraic equations. These integral equations utilize singular solutions obtained for deep (nonshallow) spherical shells, which in turn are more representative of the shell domain. Explicit comparisons, on the basis of representative shell-attachment interaction problems, between the finite element and boundary integral computational techniques are conducted in order to assess the performance and efficiency of the new method. Finally, shell stiffnesses in the form of insert translations and rotations are presented in dimensionless form.

1.
ANSYS, 1989, Engineering Analysis System, Swanson Analysis, Inc., Houston, PA.
2.
Bijlaard
P. P.
,
1957
, “
Local Stresses in Spherical Shells from Radial or Moment Loadings
,”
Welding Journal
, Vol.
36
, No.
5
Research Supplement, pp.
240-s–243-s
240-s–243-s
.
3.
Brooks
G. N.
,
1988
, “
A Boundary Integral Analysis of Lugs Attached to Cylindrical Pressure Vessels
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
110
, pp.
355
360
.
4.
Brooks, G. N., 1990a, “Spring Constants for Rectangular Attachments to Spherical Shells,” ASME PVP-Vol. 194, pp. 9–13.
5.
Brooks, G. N., 1990b, “Spring Constants for Rectangular Attachments to Cylindrical Shells,” ASME PVP-Vol. 194, pp. 65–70.
6.
Burgess, G. J., 1981, “The Numerical Treatment of Body Forces, Dislocation Fields and Arrays of Cracks in Plane Elastostatic Problems,” Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
7.
Chao, T. L., 1985, “Stresses in Spherical Shells Due to Local Loadings Over a Rectangular Area,” ASME PVP-Vol. 98-8, pp. 17–21.
8.
Chassapis, C., Philippacopoulos, A. J., and Simos, N., 1985, “Localized Stresses in Spherical Shell/Attachment Interaction: Boundary Integral-Finite Element Approach Comparisons,” ASME PVP-Vol. 214, pp. 153–159.
9.
Forbes, D. J., and Robinson, A. R., 1969, “Numerical Analysis of Elastic Plate and Shallow Shells by an Integral Equation Method,” Structural Research Series Report No. 345, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
10.
Leung
C. P.
, and
Brooks
G. N.
,
1990
, “
Elastic-Plastic Analysis of a Spherical Shell Loaded Radially Through a Flexible Cylindrical Nozzle
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
112
, pp.
296
302
.
11.
Lyow, B. L., Sun, B. C., and Koplik, B., 1990, “Finite Element Method to Determine the Localized Stresses and Spring Constants Part II—Localized Stresses,” ASME PVP-Vol. 194, pp. 44–64.
12.
Mahajerin
E.
, and
Sikarskie
D. L.
,
1986
, “
Boundary Element Study of a Loaded Hole in an Orthotropic Plate
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
20
, pp.
375
389
.
13.
Niwa, Y., Kobayashi, S., and Fukui, T., 1974, “An Application of the Integral Equation Method to Plate Bending,” Memo, Vol. 36, pp. 140–158, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan.
14.
Reissner
E.
,
1959
, “
On the Determination of Stresses and Displacements for Unsymmetrical Deformation of Shallow Spherical Shells
,”
Journal of Mathematical Physics
, Vol.
38
, pp.
16
35
.
15.
Roy, G., and Tyson, W. R., 1986, “Stress Analysis by the Superposition and Collocation Method,” presented at the 2nd Boundary Element Technology Conference, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
16.
Sanders
J. L.
,
1970
, “
Cutouts in Shallow Shells
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
37
, pp.
374
383
.
17.
Simos, N., and Sadegh, A. M., 1989a, “A Boundary Integral Equation to Nonshallow Spherical Shell Problems with Arbitrary Boundary Constraints,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Paper No. 89-WA/APM-29.
18.
Simos
N.
, and
Sadegh
A. M.
,
1989
b, “
Self-Equilibrated Singular Solutions of a Complete Spherical Shell: Classical Theory Approach
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
56
, pp.
105
112
.
19.
Simos
N.
, and
Sadegh
A. M.
,
1991
, “
An Indirect BIM for Static Analysis of Spherical Shells Using Auxiliary Boundaries
,”
International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
32
, pp.
313
325
.
20.
Sun, H. C., Sun, B. C., and Herman, H., 1990, “Finite Element Analysis of Piping-Nozzle Connections: Part I Spring Constants, Part II Localized Stresses,” ASME PVP-Vol. 194, pp. 44–64.
21.
Timoshenko, S., and Woinowsky-Kreiger, S., 1959, Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
22.
Tsai
C. J.
, and
Sanders
J. L.
,
1975
, “
Elliptical Cutouts in Cylindrical Shells
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
42
, pp.
326
334
.
23.
Wilkinson, J. P., and Kalnins, A., 1965, “On Nonsymmetric Dynamic Problems of Elastic Spherical Shells,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, Paper No. 65-APM-9.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.