Abstract

Thermal cycling induced fatigue is widely recognized as one of the major contributors to the damage of nuclear plant piping systems, especially at locations where turbulent mixing of flows with different temperature occurs. Thermal fatigue caused by swirl penetration interaction with normally stagnant water layers has been identified as a mechanism that can lead to cracking in dead-ended branch lines attached to pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary coolant system. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has developed screening methods, derived from extensive testing and analysis, to determine which lines are potentially affected as well as evaluation methods to perform evaluations of this thermal fatigue mechanism for the U.S. PWR plants. However, recent industry operating experience (OE) indicates that the model used to predict thermal fatigue due to swirl penetration is not fully understood. There are limitations with the EPRI generic evaluation. In addition, cumulative effects from other thermal transients, especially those resulted from outflow activities, may also contribute to the failure of reactor coolant system (RCS) branch lines. In this paper, we report direct OE from one of our PWR units where thermal fatigue cracking is observed at the RCS loop drain line close to the welded region of the elbow. A conservative analytical approach that takes into account the influence of thermal stratification, in accordance with ASME section III class 1 piping stress method, is also proposed to evaluate the severity of fatigue damage to the RCS drain line, as a result of various transients, particularly the transients from outflow activities. Finally, recommendations are made for future operation and inspection based on results of the evaluation.

References

1.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
2004
,
Materials Reliability Program: Thermal Cycling Screening and Evaluation Model for Normally Stagnant Non-Isolable Reactor Coolant Branch Line Piping With a Generic Application Assessment
,
Electric Power Research Institute
,
Palo Alto, CA
, Standard No. MRP-132
2.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
2005
,
Materials Reliability Program: Management of Thermal Fatigue in Normally Stagnant Non-Isolable Reactor Coolant System Branch Lines
,
Electric Power Research Institute
,
Palo Alto, CA
, Standard No. MRP-146.
3.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
2006
,
EPRI Thermal Fatigue Evaluation per MRP-146, Version 1.0
,
Electric Power Research Institute
,
Palo Alto, CA
, Standard No. MRP-170.
4.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
2009
,
Materials Reliability Program: Management of Thermal Fatigue in Normally Stagnant Non-Isolable Reactor Coolant System Branch Lines Supplemental Guidance
,
Electric Power Research Institute
,
Palo Alto, CA
, Standard No. MRP-146S.
5.
McDevitt
,
M.
,
2015
,
Industry Response to Recent Thermal Fatigue Operating Experiences
,
NRC-Industry Material Workshop
,
Washington, DC
, accessed Nov. 1, 2021, https://sanonofresafety.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/10-thermal-fatigue-update.pdf
6.
Seo
,
Y. H.
,
Youm
,
H. K.
, and
Jin
,
T. E.
,
2003
, “
Fatigue Effect of RCS Branch Line With Thermal Stratification
,”
Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
,
Tokyo, Japan
, Apr. 20–23, Paper No. ICONE11-36541.10.13140/2.1.3264.3847
7.
Kweon
,
H. D.
,
Kim
,
J. S.
, and
Lee
,
K. Y.
,
2008
, “
Fatigue Design of Nuclear Class 1 Piping Considering Thermal Stratification
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
238
(
6
), pp.
1265
1274
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.11.009
8.
Dahlberg, M., Nilsson, K. F., Taylor, N., Faidy, C., Wilke, U.,Chapuliot, S., Kalkhof, D., Bretherton, I., Church, M., Solin, J., and Catalano, J.
,
2011
, “
Development of a European Procedure for Assessment of High Cycle Thermal Fatigue in Light Water Reactors: Final Report of the NESC-Thermal Fatigue Project
,”
European Commission and Directorate-General Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy
,
Petten, The Netherlands
, Report No. EUR-22763-EN.
9.
ASME
,
2010
, “
Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, Division 1, Subsection NB, Class 1 Components
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1, New York.
10.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
1999
, “
Thermal Stratification, Cycling, and Striping (TASCS)
,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Report No.
TR-103581.
11.
Talja
,
A.
, and
Hansjosten
,
E.
,
1990
, “
Results of Thermal Stratification Tests in a Horizontal Pipeline at the HDR-Facility
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
118
(
1
), pp.
29
41
.10.1016/0029-5493(90)90083-A
12.
Schuler
,
X.
, and
Herter
,
K. H.
,
2004
, “
Thermal Fatigue Due to Stratification and Thermal Shock Loading of Piping
,”
30th MPA-Seminar in Conjunction With the Ninth German-Japanese Seminar
,
Stuttgart, Germany
, Oct. 6–7, pp. 6.1–6.16.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/36/036/36036665.pdf
13.
Zeng
,
L.
,
Jansson
,
L. G.
, and
Dahlstrom
,
L.
,
2010
, “
On Fatigue Verification of Class 1 Nuclear Power Piping According to ASME NB-3600
,”
18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
,
Xi'an, China
, May 17–21, Paper No. ICONE18-29049, pp.
375
383
.
14.
Gurdal
,
R.
, and
Xu
,
S. X.
,
2009
, “
A Comparative Study of Ke Factor in Design by Analysis for Fatigue Evaluation
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2008-61222.10.1115/PVP2008-61222
You do not currently have access to this content.