Abstract

ALLEGRO is a helium-cooled fast reactor, which is being developed by the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland. It will be the demonstrator of the GFR-2400-MWth Generation IV gas-cooled fast reactors. In ALLEGRO, a three-loop safety system is designed to remove decay heat during accident conditions. The nonrotating blower blades may represent a huge pressure loss in the decay heat removal loop (DHR), which hinders natural circulation. The lower the pressure loss coefficient of the DHR blower blades is, the better cooling is available during natural circulation. On the other hand, a large core bypass develops if a DHR valve is opened inadvertently during normal operation. In this case, the higher DHR blower pressure loss is better from core cooling point of view. Consequently, the low pressure loss of the DHR blower is advantageous for core cooling in station blackout (SBO) event but disadvantageous for inadvertent DHR valve opening event. Both the above-mentioned cases may lead to insufficient core cooling in accident conditions, which threatens the integrity of the reactor core. In this study, we present CATHARE thermohydraulic calculations to assess the sensitivity of the DHR blower pressure loss coefficient for the above-mentioned two cases.

References

1.
Mayer
,
G.
,
2017
, “
Thermohydraulic Studies for the ALLEGRO Core Optimization
,” AEMI, Budapest, Hungary, Report No. AEMI-2017-206-3.2-01-M0.
2.
Kvizda
,
B.
,
Mayer
,
G.
,
Vácha
,
P.
,
Malesa
,
J.
,
Siwiec
,
A.
,
Vasile
,
A.
,
Bebjak
,
S.
, and
Hatala
,
B.
,
2019
, “
ALLEGRO Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) Demonstrator Thermal Hydraulic Benchmark
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
345
, pp.
47
61
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.02.006
3.
Keresztúri
,
2016
,
A.
, “
ALLEGRO Core Safety Parameters, Model Uncertainties, Influence on Core Transient Estimate Benchmark
,” EU Project ESNII+, Grant Agreement No. 605172, D6.1.5-1,MTA EK, Budapest, Hungary.
4.
Bertrand
,
F.
,
Dor
,
I.
,
Bentivoglio
,
F.
,
Tauveron
,
N.
, and
Dardour
,
S.
,
2011
, “
ALLEGRO Safety Approach and Risk Minimization Studies
,” GoFastR Deliverable 1.4-1, CEA, Cadarache, France.
5.
Hózer
,
Z.
,
2016
, “
ALLEGRO Fuel Related Acceptance Criteria
,” MTA EK, Budapest, Hungary, Report No. MTA EK-FRL-2016-218-1-1-M0.
6.
 
Mayer
,
G.
, and
Tóth
,
I.
,
2016
, “
Review of Existing Analysis of Transients
,” AEMI, Budapest, Hungary, Report No. AEMI-2016-206-3.2-01-M0.
7.
Vácha
,
P.
,
Mayer
,
G.
,
Vasile
,
A.
,
Kvizda
,
B.
,
Malesa
,
J.
,
Pónya
,
P.
,
Dařílek
,
P.
,
Gren
,
M.
,
Hatala
,
B.
, and
Matocha
,
V.
,
2019
, “
Progress in the ALLEGRO Project—Neutronics and Thermal-Hydraulics
,”
Proceedings of the International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2019)
, Juan-les-pins, France, May 12–15, Paper No. 000379.
You do not currently have access to this content.