Abstract

Students in design courses work on projects that are influenced by ambiguity, gender orientation, and domain relatedness. This study investigates the impacts of these factors on student self-efficacy in order to increase retention in engineering disciplines. From a comprehensive literature review and feedback from engineering experts, an instrument is developed to assess student perceptions on tolerance to ambiguity (STA), project gender orientation (PGO), and project domain relatedness (PDR). Statistical analyses are conducted to examine the influence of STA, PGO, and PDR on student self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Results indicate that an increase in the gender orientation of the project decreases student self-efficacy. Furthermore, gender bias of the design project diminishes student tolerance to deal with ambiguous situations. Therefore, instructors should consider choosing more gender-neutral projects or make appropriate adjustments in project descriptions to minimize gender bias.

Issue Section:
Design for Manufacture and the Life Cycle
Keywords:
design education, design teams
Topics:
Ambiguity, Design, Students

References

1.
King
,
A.
,
1993
, “
From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side
,”
Coll. Teach.
,
41
(
1
), pp.
30
–
35
. 10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
2.
Piaget
,
J.
,
1965
,
The Moral Judgement of the Child
,
Free Press
,
New York
.
3.
Telenko
,
C.
,
Wood
,
K.
,
Otto
,
K.
,
Elara
,
M. R.
,
Foong
,
S.
,
Pey
,
K. L.
,
Tan
,
U.-X.
,
Camburn
,
B.
,
Moreno
,
D.
, and
Frey
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Designettes: An Approach to Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Education
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
138
(
2
), p.
022001
. 10.1115/1.4031638
4.
Soman
,
R.
,
Gupta
,
N.
, and
Shih
,
C.
,
2016
, “
A Coordinated Design Course Sequence to Integrate Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Experience
,”
123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
,
New Orleans, LA
,
ASME Paper No. 15200
.
5.
Alpay
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Student Attraction to Engineering Through Flexibility and Breadth in the Curriculum
,”
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
38
(
1
), pp.
58
–
69
. 10.1080/03043797.2012.742870
6.
Lattuca
,
L. R.
,
Knight
,
D.
,
Seifert
,
T. A.
,
Reason
,
R. D.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
,
2017
, “
Examining the Impact of Interdisciplinary Programs on Student Learning
,”
Innovat. High Educ.
,
42
(
4
), pp.
337
–
353
. 10.1007/s10755-017-9393-z
7.
Richter
,
D. M.
, and
Paretti
,
M. C.
,
2009
, “
Identifying Barriers to and Outcomes of Interdisciplinarity in the Engineering Classroom
,”
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
34
(
1
), pp.
29
–
45
. 10.1080/03043790802710185
8.
Mills
,
J. E.
, and
Treagust
,
D. F.
,
2003
, “
Engineering Education—Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer?
,”
Aust. J. Eng. Educ.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
2
–
16
.
9.
Knight
,
D. W.
,
Carlson
,
L. E.
, and
Sullivan
,
J. F.
,
2007
, “
Improving Engineering Student Retention Through Hands-On, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects
,”
Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Research in Engineering Education
,
Honolulu, HI
,
June 22–24
, pp.
1
–
13
.
10.
Bairaktarova
,
D.
,
Graziano
,
W.
, and
Cox
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Enhancing Engineering Students’ Performance on Design Task: The Box of Parts
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
139
(
5
), p.
052001
. 10.1115/1.4036128
11.
Jones
,
B. D.
,
Paretti
,
M. C.
,
Hein
,
S. F.
, and
Knott
,
T. W.
,
2010
, “
An Analysis of Motivation Constructs With First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
99
(
4
), pp.
319
–
336
. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x
12.
Marra
,
R. M.
,
Rodgers
,
K. A.
,
Shen
,
D.
, and
Bogue
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
98
(
1
), pp.
27
–
38
. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x
13.
Chen
,
X.
,
2013
, “
STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields, Statistical Analysis Report
,”
>Report No. NCES 2014-001
,
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
.
14.
Okudan
,
G. E.
,
Mohammed
,
S.
, and
Ogot
,
M.
,
2006
, “
An Investigation on Industry-Sponsored Design Projects’ Effectiveness at the First-Year Level: Potential Issues and Preliminary Results
,”
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
31
(
6
), pp.
693
–
704
. 10.1080/03043790600911795
15.
Okudan
,
G. E.
, and
Mohammed
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Task Gender Orientation Perceptions by Novice Designers: Implications for Engineering Design Research, Teaching and Practice
,”
Des. Stud.
,
27
(
6
), pp.
723
–
740
. 10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.003
16.
Male
,
S. A.
,
Bush
,
M. B.
, and
Murray
,
K.
,
2009
, “
Think Engineer, Think Male?
,”
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
34
(
5
), pp.
455
–
464
. 10.1080/03043790903137759
17.
Holland
,
J. L.
,
1997
,
Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments
, 3rd ed.,
Psychological Assessment Resources
,
Odessa, FL
.
18.
Smart
,
J. C.
,
Feldman
,
K. A.
, and
Ethington
,
C. A.
,
2000
,
Academic Disciplines: Holland’s Theory and the Study of College Students and Faculty
,
Vanderbilt University Press
,
Nashville, TN
.
19.
Mourtos
,
N. J.
,
DeJong-Okamoto
,
N.
, and
Rhee
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Open-Ended Problem-Solving Skills in Thermal-Fluids Engineering
,”
Global J. Eng. Educ.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
189
–
200
.
20.
Mourtos
,
N. J.
,
2010
, “
Challenges Students Face When Solving Open-Ended Problems
,”
Int. J. Eng. Educ.
,
26
(
4
), pp.
846
–
859
.
21.
Kahn
,
B. E.
, and
Sarin
,
R. K.
,
1988
, “
Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty
,”
J. Consumer Res.
,
15
(
2
), pp.
265
–
272
. 10.1086/209163
22.
Dringenberg
,
E. A.
,
2015
, “
A Phenomenographic Analysis of First-Year Engineering Students’ Experiences With Problems Involving Multiple Possible Solutions
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Purdue University
.
23.
Hullsiek
,
B.
,
2011
, “
The Effects of Tolerance for Ambiguity and Ambiguous Instructions on Creativity
,”
Master thesis
,
University of Nebraska at Omaha
.
24.
Tauritz
,
R.
,
2012
, “How to Handle Knowledge Uncertainty: Learning and Teaching in Times of Accelerating Change,”
Learning for Sustainability in Times of Accelerating Change
,
A.
Wals
, and
P.
Corcoran
, eds.,
Wageningen Academic Publishers
,
Wageningen
, pp.
299
–
316
.
25.
Zheng
,
X.
,
Ritter
,
S. C.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2018
, “
How Concept Selection Tools Impact the Development of Creative Ideas in Engineering Design Education
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
140
(
5
), p.
052002
. 10.1115/1.4039338
26.
Kazerounian
,
K.
, and
Foley
,
S.
,
2007
, “
Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
7
), pp.
761
–
768
. 10.1115/1.2739569
27.
Richter
,
D. M.
, and
Paretti
,
M. C.
,
2009
, “
A Cognitive Framework for Understanding the Role of Students’ Expectations and Motivations in Interdisciplinary Design Collaboration
,”
Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES)
,
Palm Cove, Australia
,
July 20–23
, pp.
215
–
219
.
28.
Mohammed
,
S.
,
Okudan
,
G. E.
, and
Ogot
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Tolerance for Ambiguity: An Investigation on Its Effect on Student Design Performance?
,”
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
,
Chicago, IL
,
June 18–21
, Vol.
11
, pp.
1
–
8
.
29.
Dringenberg
,
E.
, and
Wertz
,
R.
,
2016
, “
How Do First-Year Engineering Students Experience Ambiguity in Engineering Design Problems: The Development of a Self-Report Instrument
,”
123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
,
New Orleans, LA
,
Paper No. 15094
.
30.
Okudan
,
G. E.
,
Bilén
,
S. G.
, and
Wu
,
X.
,
2003
, “
Gender Orientation of the Design Task: Product Domain and Familiarity Issues
,”
DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design
,
Stockholm
,
Aug. 19–22
, pp.
427
–
428
.
31.
Moskal
,
B. M.
,
2000
, “
Looking to the Future: Women in Science and Engineering
,”
Proceedings of the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2000 (FIE 2000)
,
Kansas City, MO
,
Oct. 18–21
,
IEEE
, Vol.
11
, pp.
F1B/19
–
F11B/24
.
32.
Moskal
,
B. M.
,
Knecht
,
R.
, and
Lasich
,
D.
,
2002
, “
Engineering Design: Using a Scoring Rubric to Compare the Products of Teams That Differ in Gender Composition
,”
Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
,
Montreal, Canada
,
June 16–19
, pp.
1
–
12
.
33.
Amelink
,
C. T.
, and
Meszaros
,
P. S.
,
2011
, “
A Comparison of Educational Factors Promoting or Discouraging the Intent to Remain in Engineering by Gender
,”
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
36
(
1
), pp.
47
–
62
. 10.1080/03043797.2010.531695
34.
Hill
,
C.
,
Corbett
,
C.
, and
St Rose
,
A.
,
2010
,
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
,
ERIC, American Association of University Women
,
Washington, DC
.
35.
Baker
,
D. R.
,
2016
, “An Intervention to Address Gender Issues in a Course on Design, Engineering, and Technology for Science Educators,”
Understanding Girls
,
Springer/Sense Publishers
,
New York/Rotterdam
, pp.
161
–
196
.
36.
Nicholls
,
G. M.
,
Wolfe
,
H.
,
Besterfield-Sacre
,
M.
,
Shuman
,
L. J.
, and
Larpkiattaworn
,
S.
,
2007
, “
A Method for Identifying Variables for Predicting STEM Enrollment
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
96
(
1
), pp.
33
–
44
. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00913.x
37.
Bucak
,
S.
, and
Kadirgan
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Influence of Gender in Choosing a Career Amongst Engineering Fields: A Survey Study From Turkey
,”
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
36
(
5
), pp.
449
–
460
. 10.1080/03043797.2011.606499
38.
Knight
,
D. B.
,
Lattuca
,
L. R.
,
Yin
,
A.
,
Kremer
,
G.
,
York
,
T.
, and
Ro
,
H. K.
,
2012
, “
An Exploration of Gender Diversity in Engineering Programs: A Curriculum and Instruction-Based Perspective
,”
J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
55
–
78
. 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2012003702
39.
Bandura
,
A.
,
1977
, “
Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change
,”
Psychol. Rev.
,
84
(
2
), pp.
191
–
215
. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
40.
Bandura
,
A.
,
2000
, “
Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy
,”
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
75
–
78
. 10.1111/1467-8721.00064
41.
Chachra
,
D.
,
Dillon
,
A.
,
Spingola
,
E.
, and
Saul
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Self-Efficacy and Task Orientation in First-Year Engineering Design Courses
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
,
Madrid, Spain
,
Oct. 22–25
, pp.
1
–
4
.
42.
McLain
,
D. L.
,
1993
, “
The MSTAT-I: A New Measure of an Individual’s Tolerance for Ambiguity
,”
Educ. Psychol. Meas.
,
53
(
1
), pp.
183
–
189
. 10.1177/0013164493053001020
43.
Jex
,
S. M.
, and
Bliese
,
P. D.
,
1999
, “
Efficacy Beliefs as a Moderator of the Impact of Work-Related Stressors: A Multilevel Study
,”
J. Appl. Psychol.
,
84
(
3
), p.
349
. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349
44.
Zimmerman
,
B. J.
,
Bandura
,
A.
, and
Martinez-Pons
,
M.
,
1992
, “
Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting
,”
Am. Educ. Res. J.
,
29
(
3
), pp.
663
–
676
. 10.3102/00028312029003663
45.
Hutchison
,
M. A.
,
Follman
,
D. K.
,
Sumpter
,
M.
, and
Bodner
,
G. M.
,
2006
, “
Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
95
(
1
), pp.
39
–
47
. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00876.x
Copyright © 2020 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.