Abstract

Though academic research for identifying and considering the social impact of products is emerging, additional insights can be gained from engineers who design products every day. This paper explores current practices in industries used by design engineers to consider the social impact of products. Forty-six individuals from 34 different companies were interviewed to discover what disconnects exist between academia and industry when considering a product’s social impact. These interviews were also used to discover how social impact might be considered in a design setting moving forward. This is not a study to find “the state of the art,” but considers the average engineering professional’s work to design products in various industries. Social impact assessments (SIA) and social life cycle assessments (SLCA) are two of the most common processes discussed in the literature to evaluate social impact, both generally and in products. Interestingly, these processes did not arise in any discussion in interviews, despite respondents affirming that they do consider social impact in the product design. Processes used to predict social impact, rather than simply evaluate, were discussed by the respondents. These tended to be developed within the company and often related to industry imposed government regulations. To build on this study, the findings herein should be further validated for executives, managers, and engineers. A study specific to these roles should be designed to understand the disconnect better. Additionally, processes should be developed to assist engineers in considering the social impact of their products. Work should also be done to help educate engineers and their leaders on the value of considering the social impact in product design.

References

1.
Alwi
,
S. R. W.
,
Manan
,
Z. A.
,
Klemeš
,
J. J.
, and
Huisingh
,
D.
,
2014
, Sustainability Engineering for the Future.
2.
Perl
,
J.
,
2016
,
Sustainability Engineering: A Design Guide for the Chemical Process Industry
,
Springer
,
New York, NY
.
3.
Younesi
,
M.
, and
Roghanian
,
E.
,
2015
, “
A Framework for Sustainable Product Design: A Hybrid Fuzzy Approach Based on Quality Function Deployment for Environment
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
108
, pp.
385
394
. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.028
4.
Lankenau
,
G. F. D.
, and
Winter
,
A. G.
,
2019
, “
An Engineering Review of the Farm Tractor’s Evolution to a Dominant Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
3
), p.
031107
. 10.1115/1.4042338
5.
Brundtland
,
G. H.
,
1987
,
Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: “our Common Future”
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
6.
Elkington
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Enter the Triple Bottom Line
,”
The Triple Bottom Line: Does it all Add Up?
, Vol.
11
. pp.
1
16
.
7.
Buchert
,
T.
,
Neugebauer
,
S.
,
Schenker
,
S.
,
Lindow
,
K.
, and
Stark
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Multi-Criteria Decision Making As a Tool for Sustainable Product Development—Benefits and Obstacles
,”
Procedia CIRP
,
26
, pp.
70
75
. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.110
8.
Burdge
,
R. J.
,
2004
,
A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessment
,
Social Ecology Press
,
Louisville, CO
.
9.
Rainock
,
M.
,
Everett
,
D.
,
Pack
,
A.
,
Dahlin
,
E. C.
, and
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
2018
, “
The Social Impacts of Products: A Review
,”
Impact Assess. Project Appraisal
,
3
, pp.
1
12
.
10.
Ottosson
,
H.
,
Hirschi
,
E.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Dahlin
,
E.
,
2017
, “
A Simple Starting Point for Designing for and/or Assessing the Social Impact of Products
”.
In ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Cleveland, OH
,
Aug. 6–9
, p.
V02BT03A015
.
11.
Mattson
,
C. A.
, and
Wood
,
A. E.
,
2014
, “
Nine Principles for Design for the Developing World As Derived From the Engineering Literature
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
12
), p.
121403
. 10.1115/1.4027984
12.
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Wood
,
A. E.
, and
Renouard
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Village Drill: A Case Study in Engineering for Global Development With Five Years of Data Post Market-Introduction
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
139
(
6
), p.
065001
. 10.1115/1.4036304
13.
Judge
,
B. M.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
, and
Winter
,
A. G.
,
2015
, “
Developing World Users As Lead Users: A Case Study in Engineering Reverse Innovation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
7
), p.
071406
. 10.1115/1.4030057
14.
Mahmoudi
,
H.
,
Renn
,
O.
,
Vanclay
,
F.
,
Hoffmann
,
V.
, and
Karami
,
E.
,
2013
, “
A Framework for Combining Social Impact Assessment and Risk Assessment
,”
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
,
43
, pp.
1
8
. 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.003
15.
Esteves
,
A. M.
,
Franks
,
D.
, and
Vanclay
,
F.
,
2012
, “
Social Impact Assessment: the State of the Art
,”
Impact Assess. Project Appraisal
,
30
(
1
), pp.
34
42
. 10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
16.
Jørgensen
,
A.
,
Bocq
,
A. L.
,
Nazarkina
,
L.
,
Hauschild
,
M.
,
Le Bocq
,
A.
,
Nazarkina
,
L.
, and
Hauschild
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Methodologies for Social Life Cycle Assessment
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
13
(
2
), pp.
96
103
. 10.1065/lca2007.11.367
17.
Benoît,
C.
, and
Mazijn
,
B.
,
2009
Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, United Nations Environment Programme. DTI/1164/PA.
18.
Siebert
,
A.
,
Bezama
,
A.
,
O’Keeffe
,
S.
,
Thrän
,
D.
,
Keeffe
,
S. O.
, and
Thrän
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Social Life Cycle Assessment: In Pursuit of a Framework for Assessing Wood-Based Products From Bioeconomy Regions in Germany
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
23
, pp.
1
12
.
19.
Gmelin
,
H.
, and
Seuring
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Determinants of a Sustainable New Product Development
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
69
, pp.
1
9
. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.053
20.
Chhipi-Shrestha
,
G. K.
,
Hewage
,
K.
, and
Sadiq
,
R.
,
2015
, “
‘Socializing’ Sustainability: A Critical Review on Current Development Status of Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method
,”
Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy.
,
17
(
3
), pp.
579
596
. 10.1007/s10098-014-0841-5
21.
Hutchins
,
M. J.
, and
Sutherland
,
J. W.
,
2018
, “
An Exploration of Measures of Social Sustainability and Their Application to Supply Chain Decisions
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
16
(
15
), pp.
1688
1698
. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.001
22.
Norris
,
G. A.
,
2006
, “
Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles-Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
11
(
1
), pp.
97
104
. 10.1065/lca2006.04.017
23.
Ma
,
J.
, and
Kremer
,
G. E. O.
,
2015
,
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Boston, MA
,
Aug. 2–5
, p.
V004T05A053
.
24.
Stevenson
,
P. D.
,
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Bryden
,
K. M.
, and
MacCarty
,
N. A.
,
2018
, “
Toward a Universal Social Impact Metric for Engineered Products That Alleviate Poverty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
140
(
4
), p.
41404
. 10.1115/1.4038925
25.
Svensson
,
M.
, and
Gould
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Hurdles to Clear: Cognitive Barriers in Sustainable Product Development
,”
23rd Nordic Academy of Management Conference
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Aug. 12–14
.
26.
Alsaffar
,
A. J.
,
Raoufi
,
K.
,
Kim
,
K.-Y.
,
Kremer
,
G. E. O.
, and
Haapala
,
K. R.
,
2016
, “
Simultaneous Consideration of Unit Manufacturing Processes and Supply Chain Activities for Reduction of Product Environmental and Social Impacts
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
138
(
10
), p.
101009
. 10.1115/1.4034481
27.
Fuge
,
M.
, and
Agogino
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Pattern Analysis of Ideo’s Human-Centered Design Methods in Developing Regions
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
7
), p.
071405
. 10.1115/1.4030047
28.
Ahmad
,
S.
,
Wong
,
K. Y.
,
Tseng
,
M. L.
, and
Wong
,
W. P.
,
2018
, “
Sustainable Product Design and Development: A Review of Tools, Applications and Research Prospects
,”
Resour., Conserv. Recycling.
,
132
, pp.
49
61
.
29.
Schöggl
,
J.-P.
,
Baumgartner
,
R. J.
, and
Hofer
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Improving Sustainability Performance in Early Phases of Product Design: A Checklist for Sustainable Product Development Tested in the Automotive Industry
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
140
, pp.
1602
1617
. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195
30.
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
Pack
,
A. T.
,
Lofthouse
,
V.
, and
Bhamra
,
T.
,
2019
, “
Using a Product’s Sustainability Space As a Design Exploration Tool
,”
Des. Sci.
,
5
(
1
), pp.
1
34
. 10.1017/dsj.2018.6
31.
Wood
,
A. E.
, and
Mattson
,
C. A.
,
2019
, “
Quantifying the Effects of Various Factors on the Utility of Design Ethnography in the Developing World
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
317
338
. 10.1007/s00163-018-00304-2
32.
Chen
,
C.-H.
,
Khoo
,
L. P.
, and
Yan
,
W.
,
2003
, “
Evaluation of Multicultural Factors From Elicited Customer Requirements for New Product Development
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
119
130
. 10.1007/s00163-003-0032-6
33.
Garay
,
L.
, and
Font
,
X.
,
2012
, “
Doing Good to Do Well? Corporate Social Responsibility Reasons, Practices and Impacts in Small and Medium Accommodation Enterprises
,”
Int. J. Hospitality Manage.
,
31
(
2
), pp.
329
337
. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.013
34.
Jørgensen
,
A.
,
Hauschild
,
M. Z.
,
Jørgensen
,
M. S.
, and
Wangel
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Relevance and Feasibility of Social Life Cycle Assessment From a Company Perspective
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
204
214
. 10.1007/s11367-009-0073-9
35.
Short
,
T.
,
Lee-Mortimer
,
A.
,
Luttropp
,
C.
, and
Johansson
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Manufacturing, Sustainability, Ecodesign and Risk: Lessons Learned From a Study of Swedish and English Companies
,”
J. Cleaner. Prod.
,
37
, pp.
342
352
. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.037
36.
Kalish
,
D.
,
Burek
,
S.
,
Costello
,
A.
,
Schwartz
,
L.
, and
Taylor
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Integrating Sustainability Into New Product Development: Available Tools and Frameworks Can Help Companies Ensure that Sustainability is Embedded As a Fundamental Building Block of New Product Development
,”
Res. Technol. Manage.
,
61
(
2
), pp.
37
46
. 10.1080/08956308.2018.1421379
37.
Rapley
,
T. J.
,
2001
, “
The Art (fulness) of Open-Ended Interviewing: Some Considerations on Analysing Interviews
,”
Qual. Res.
,
1
(
3
), pp.
303
323
. 10.1177/146879410100100303
38.
Emmel
,
N.
,
2013
,
Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach
,
Sage
,
Los Angeles, CA
.
39.
Suri
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis
,”
Qual. Res. J.
,
11
(
2
), pp.
63
75
. 10.3316/QRJ1102063
40.
Luker
,
K.
,
2008
,
Salsa Dancing Into the Social Sciences
,
Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
41.
Fereday
,
J.
, and
Muir-Cochrane
,
E.
,
2006
, “
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development
,”
Int. J. Qual. Methods
,
5
(
1
), pp.
80
92
. 10.1177/160940690600500107
42.
Charmaz
,
K.
,
2014
,
Constructing Grounded Theory
,
Sage
,
Los Angeles, CA
.
43.
Monette
,
D. R.
,
Sullivan
,
T. J.
, and
DeJong
,
C. R.
,
2013
,
Applied Social Research: A Tool for the Human Services
,
Cengage Learning
.
44.
Attride-Stirling
,
J.
,
2001
, “
Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research
,”
Qual. Res.
,
1
(
3
), pp.
385
405
. 10.1177/146879410100100307
45.
Teng
,
S.-H.
, and
Ho
,
S.-Y.
,
1996
, “
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: An Integrated Approach for Product Design and Process Control
,”
Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage.
,
13
(
5
), pp.
8
26
. 10.1108/02656719610118151
You do not currently have access to this content.