This work investigates how consumers make preference judgments when taking into account both product form and function. In prior work, where aesthetic preference is quantified using visual conjoint methods, aesthetic preference and functional preference were handled separately. Here, we introduce a new methodology, metaconjoint analysis, for testing the hypothesis that when consumers make decisions taking into account both a product's form and its function they employ a more complex decision-making strategy than when basing their decisions on form or function alone. We anticipate that this strategy will involve both analytical and emotional processes. When compared with participant ratings of form and function combinations across 28 subjects, the metaconjoint model is shown to have a correlation that was not statistically different from an additive model of form and function. However, unlike the additive model, the metaconjoint model gave additional information about how participants make tradeoffs between form and function. Next, we developed a novel paradigm using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine what parts of the brain are primarily involved with a given tradeoff between form and function. While in the scanner, study participants were asked to make decisions in trials where only form varied, where only function varied, and where both form and function varied. Results from 14 participants suggest that choices based on products that vary in both form and function involve some unique and some common brain networks as compared to choices based on form or function alone; notably, emotion-related regions are activated during these complex decisions where form and function are in conflict. These results are consistent with the inclusion of emotion in decision-making with regards to product choice and demonstrate the feasibility of using fMRI to address questions about the mental processes underlying consumer decisions. Studying preference decisions together with their accompanying neurological activity will give engineers and designers greater insight into the consumer decision-making process.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2013
Research-Article
Understanding Consumer Tradeoffs Between Form and Function Through Metaconjoint and Cognitive Neuroscience Analyses
Brian Sylcott,
Jonathan Cagan,
Jonathan Cagan
e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University
,Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Search for other works by this author on:
Golnaz Tabibnia
Golnaz Tabibnia
Department of Social & Decision Sciences,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: tabibnia@uci.edu
Carnegie Mellon University
,Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: tabibnia@uci.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian Sylcott
e-mail: sylcott@alumni.cmu.edu
Jonathan Cagan
e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University
,Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Golnaz Tabibnia
Department of Social & Decision Sciences,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: tabibnia@uci.edu
Carnegie Mellon University
,Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: tabibnia@uci.edu
Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received April 5, 2012; final manuscript received June 28, 2013; published online August 7, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wei Chen.
J. Mech. Des. Oct 2013, 135(10): 101002 (13 pages)
Published Online: August 7, 2013
Article history
Received:
April 5, 2012
Revision Received:
June 28, 2013
Citation
Sylcott, B., Cagan, J., and Tabibnia, G. (August 7, 2013). "Understanding Consumer Tradeoffs Between Form and Function Through Metaconjoint and Cognitive Neuroscience Analyses." ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2013; 135(10): 101002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024975
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Design and Implementation of a Broker for Cloud Additive Manufacturing Services
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (August,2015)
Limitations of Pareto Front in Design Under Uncertainty and Their Reconciliation
J. Mech. Des (July,2013)
Using Parameterized Pareto Sets to Model Design Concepts
J. Mech. Des (April,2010)
Adaptive Energy Optimization Toward Net-Zero Energy Building Clusters
J. Mech. Des (June,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Utility Function Fundamentals
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Interactive Virtual Prototyping for Improving the Design of Consumer Products
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
Digital Human in Engineering and Bioengineering Applications
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1