A common implicit assumption in engineering design is that user preferences exist a priori. However, research from behavioral psychology and experimental economics suggests that individuals construct preferences on a case-by-case basis when called to make a decision rather than referring to an existing preference structure. Thus, across different contexts, preference elicitation methods used in design decision making can lead to preference inconsistencies. This paper offers a framework for understanding preference inconsistencies, giving three examples of preference inconsistencies that demonstrate the implications of unnoticed inconsistencies, and also discusses the design benefits of testing for inconsistencies. Three common engineering and marketing design methods are discussed: discrete choice analysis, modeling stated versus revealed preferences, and the Kano method. In these examples, we discuss perceived relationships between product attributes, identify market opportunities for a “green” product, and show how people find it is easier to imagine delight rather than necessity of product attributes. Understanding preference inconsistencies offers new insights into the relationship between user and product design.

1.
Slovic
,
P.
, 1995, “
The Construction of Preference
,”
Am. Psychol.
0003-066X,
50
(
5
), pp.
364
371
.
2.
McGettigan
,
P.
,
Sly
,
K.
, and
O’Connell
,
D.
, 1999, “
The Effects of Information Framing on the Practices of Physicians
,”
J. Gen. Intern. Med.
,
14
(
10
), pp.
633
642
. 0884-8734
3.
Kerstholt
,
J.
, and
Jackson
,
J.
, 1998, “
Judicial Decision Making: Order of Evidence Presentation and Availability of Background Information
,”
Appl. Cognit. Psychol.
,
12
(
5
), pp.
445
454
. 0888-4080
4.
MacDonald
,
E.
,
Gonzalez
,
R.
, and
Papalambros
,
P.
, 2007, “
The Construction of Preferences for Crux and Sentinel Product Attributes
,”
Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Engineering Design
, Paris.
5.
Kagel
,
J.
, and
Roth
,
A.
, 1995,
Handbook of Experimental Economics
,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
6.
Fitzsimons
,
G.
,
Hutchinson
,
J.
, and
Williams
,
P.
, 2002, “
Non-Conscious Influences on Consumer Choice
,”
Mark. Lett.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
269
279
. 0923-0645
7.
Kahneman
,
D.
, and
Tversky
,
A.
, 1979, “
Prospect Theory—Analysis of Decision Under Risk
,”
Econometrica
0012-9682,
47
(
2
), pp.
263
291
.
8.
Sudman
,
S.
,
Bradburn
,
N.
, and
Schwarz
,
N.
, 1996,
Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology
,
Jossey-Bass
,
San Francisco
.
9.
Luce
,
R. D.
, and
Suppes
,
P.
, 1965,
Preference, Utility, and Subjective Probability
,
Handbook of Mathematical Psychology
,
R. D.
Luce
,
R. R.
Bush
, and
E.
Galanter
, eds.,
Wiley
,
New York
, Vol.
III
, pp.
249
410
.
10.
Wu
,
C. F. J.
, and
Hamada
,
M.
, 2000,
Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
11.
Bem
,
D. J.
, 1979, “
Template Matching: A Proposal for Probing the Ecological Validity of Experimental Settings in Social Psychology
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
37
(
6
), pp.
833
846
. 0022-3514
12.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
Wagner
,
A. K.
, and
Lynch
,
J. G.
, 2000, “
Unobserved Heterogeneity as an Alternative Explanation for “Reversal” Effects in Behavioral Research
,”
J. Consum. Res.
0093-5301,
27
(
3
), pp.
324
344
.
13.
Luo
,
L.
,
Kannan
,
P. K.
, and
Besharati
,
B.
, 2005, “
Design of Robust New Products Under Variability: Marketing Meets Design
,”
J. Prod. Innov. Manage.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
177
192
. 0737-6782
14.
Besharati
,
B.
,
Luo
,
L.
, and
Azarm
,
S.
, 2006, “
Multi-Objective Single Product Robust Optimization: An Integrated Design and Marketing Approach
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
128
(
4
), pp.
884
892
.
15.
Pullman
,
M.
,
Moore
,
W.
, and
Wardell
,
D.
, 2002, “
A Comparison of Quality Function Deployment and Conjoint Analysis in New Product Design
,”
J. Prod. Innov. Manage.
,
19
(
5
), pp.
354
364
. 0737-6782
16.
Michalek
,
J. J.
, 2005,
“Preference Coordination in Engineering Design Decision-Making
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
17.
Wassenaar
,
H. J.
,
Chen
,
W.
, and
Cheng
,
J.
, 2005, “
Enhancing Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
127
(
4
), pp.
514
523
.
18.
See
,
T.
,
Gurnani
,
A.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
, 2004, “
Multi-Attribute Decision Making Using Hypothetical Equivalents and Inequivalents
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
126
(
6
), pp.
950
958
.
19.
Tetlock
,
P.
,
Skitka
,
L.
, and
Boettger
,
R.
, 1989, “
Social and Cognitive Strategies for Coping With Accountability: Conformity, Complexity, and Bolstering
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
57
(
4
), pp.
632
640
. 0022-3514
20.
Nickerson
,
R.
, 1998, “
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
,”
Rev. Gen. Psychol.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
175
220
. 1089-2680
21.
Kulok
,
M.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
, 2005, “
Preference Consistency in Multiattribute Decision Making
,”
2005 ASME Design Technical Conferences
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Los Angeles
, Paper No. DETC2005-84764.
22.
Gurnani
,
A.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
, 2006, “
Decentralized Design at the Edge of Rationality
,”
2006 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Philadelphia
, Paper No. DETC2006–99520.
25.
2005, The CBC/HB System for Hierarchical Bayes Estimation Version 4.0 Technical Paper, Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, SAWTOOTH Software, Sequim, WA.
26.
Train
,
K.
, 2003,
Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, Chap. 6.
27.
Louviere
,
J.
,
Hensher
,
D.
, and
Swait
,
J.
, 2000,
Stated Choice Methods
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
.
28.
Rossi
,
P.
,
Allenby
,
G.
, and
McCulloch
,
R.
, 2005,
Bayesian Statistics and Marketing
,
Wiley
,
West Sussex, UK
.
30.
Bennett
,
J.
, and
Blamey
,
R.
, 2001, “
Yea-Saying and Validation of a Choice Model of Green Product Choice
,”
The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation
,
J.
Bennett
and
R.
Blamey
, eds.,
Edward Elgar
,
Cheltenham, UK
, pp.
178
201
.
31.
Kahneman
,
D.
, and
Knetsch
,
J.
, 1992, “
Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction
,”
J. Envir. Econom. Manage.
,
22
(
1
), pp.
57
70
. 0095-0696
32.
Thompson
,
L.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
, 1997, “
Environmental Disputes Competition for Scarce Resources and Clashing Values
,”
Environment, Ethics, and Behavior: The Psychology of Environmental Valuation and Degradation
,
M.
Bazerman
,
D.
Messick
, and
K.
Wade-Benzoni
, eds.,
New Lexington
,
San Francisco
, pp.
75
104
.
33.
Goldstein
,
W.
, and
Howard
,
C.
, 1992, “
The Relative Importance of Relative Importance: Inferring Other People’s Preferences From Relative Importance Ratings and Previous Decisions
,”
Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process
,
51
(
3
), pp.
382
415
. 0749-5978
34.
Guber
,
D.
, 2003,
The Grassroots of Green Revolution: Polling America on the Environment
,
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
, Chap. 8.
35.
Mintel Oxygen
, 2006, Mintel International Group Limited, Household Paper Products Report.
36.
Kano
,
N.
,
Seraku
,
N.
,
Takahashi
,
F.
, and
Tsuji
,
S.
, 1984, “
“Attractive Quality and Must Be Quality
,”
Quality The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control
,
14
(
2
), pp.
39
48
.
37.
MacDonald
,
E.
,
Backsell
,
M.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
, 2006, “
The Kano Method’s Imperfections, and Implications in Product Decision Theory
,”
Proceedings of the 2006 International Design Research Symposium
,
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Seoul, Korea
.
38.
Spitzer
,
R.
, and
Fleiss
,
J.
, 1974, “
A Re-Analysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis
,”
Br. J. Psychiatry
,
125
(
4
), pp.
341
347
. 0007-1250
You do not currently have access to this content.