Transfer of knowledge is a common and ongoing area of investigation in many education studies. The topic is of central importance to the education community because it enables educators to understand how knowledge learned in one context can apply, or transfer, to new contexts. This is particularly important in the context of technological innovation and design education. That is, design often requires the generation of solutions that do not already exist. Generating unique solutions requires the ability to recognize when previous knowledge or learning is appropriate, and then to accurately apply previous learning to novel situations. Furthermore, focusing on transfer of knowledge brings a learner-centered approach to education such that learning experiences are designed to reinforce and to build on students’ prior knowledge. This paper presents results from a study that measured the type of design process knowledge that gets transferred into and out of design-focused courses. The study included approximately 100 students in three different courses: one freshman and two upper-level design courses. Results from this study shed light on the nature of students’ design process knowledge, as novice (freshman) as well as more experienced (junior and senior) student designers. In addition, study results show significant increases in pre- and post-measures of design process knowledge as students advance in the curriculum. Finally, we describe our findings in the context of an emerging framework for instruction and assessment: adaptive expertise. The concept of adaptive expertise is relevant to design education since it presents a model that guides the educational experience to have a balance of gaining technical proficiency with opportunities for applying one’s knowledge in innovative ways.

1.
Schwartz
,
D. L.
,
Bransford
,
J. D.
, and
Sears
,
D.
, 2005, “
Efficiency and Innovation in Transfer
,” in
Transfer of Learning From a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective
,
Jose
Mestre
, ed.,
Information Age Publishing, Inc.
, Charlotte, NC, pp.
1
51
.
2.
McKenna
,
A. F.
,
Colgate
,
J. E.
,
Olson
,
G. B.
, and
Carr
,
S.
, 2006, “
Exploring Adaptive Expertise as a Target for Engineering Design Education
,”
Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering (IDETC/CIE) Conference, IDETC/CIE 2006
,
ASME
, Philadelphia, PA, Sept.
10
13
.
3.
Hatano
,
G.
, and
Inagaki
,
K.
, 1986, “
Two Courses of Expertise
,” in
Child Development and Education in Japan
,
H.
Stevenson
,
H.
Azuma
, and
K.
Hakuta
eds.,
Freeman
, New York, pp.
262
272
.
4.
Hatano
,
G.
, and
Oura
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Commentary: Reconceptualizing School Learning Using Insight From Expertise Research
,”
Educ. Res.
0013-189X,
32
(
8
), pp.
26
29
.
5.
Bransford
,
J. D.
,
Brown
,
A. L.
, and
Cocking
,
R. R.
eds., 2000,
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School
,
National Academy Press
, Washington, DC.
6.
Jonassen
,
D.
,
Strobel
,
J.
, and
Beng Lee
,
C.
, 2006, “
Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Education
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
1069-4730,
95
(
2
), pp.
139
151
.
7.
Goel
,
V.
, and
Pirolli
,
P.
, 1992, “
The Structure of Design Problem Spaces
,”
Cognitive Science
,
16
,
395
429
.
8.
Bucciarelli
,
L. L.
, 1996,
Designing Engineers
,
MIT Press
, Cambridge.
9.
McMartin
,
F.
,
McKenna
,
A.
, and
Youseffi
,
K.
, 2000, “
Scenario Assignments as Assessment Tools for Undergraduate Engineering Education
,”
IEEE Trans. Educ.
0018-9359,
43
(
2
), pp.
111
119
.
10.
Walker
,
J. M. T.
,
Cordray
,
D. S.
,
King
,
P. H.
, and
Brophy
,
S. P.
, 2006, “
Design Scenarios as an Assessment of Adaptive Expertise
,”
Int. J. Eng. Educ.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
645
651
.
11.
Eastman
,
C.
,
McCracken
,
W. M.
, and
Newstetter
,
W. C.
, eds., 2001,
Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education
,
Elsevier
, New York.
12.
McKenna
,
A. F.
, and
Hirsch
,
P.
, 2005, “
Evaluating Student Confidence in Engineering Design, Teamwork and Communication
,”
Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference
,
ASEE
, Portland, OR.
13.
Brown
,
A. L.
, 1992, “
Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings
,”
J. Learn. Sci.
1050-8406,
2
(
2
),
141
178
.
You do not currently have access to this content.