Turbine-based combined-cycle (TBCC) propulsion systems have been a topic of research as a means for more efficient flight at supersonic and hypersonic speeds. The present study focuses on the fundamental physics of the complex flow in the TBCC exhaust system during the transition mode as the turbine exhaust is shut off and the ramjet exhaust is increased. A TBCC exhaust system was designed using methods of characteristics (MOC) and subjected to experimental and computational study. The main objectives of the study were: (1) to identify the interactions between the two exhaust jet streams during the transition mode phase and their effects on the whole flow-field structure; (2) to determine and verify the aerodynamic performance of the over–under TBCC exhaust nozzle; and (3) to validate the simulation ability of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software according to the experimental conditions. Static pressure taps and Schlieren apparatus were employed to obtain the wall pressure distributions and flow-field structures. Steady-state tests were performed with the ramjet nozzle cowl at six different positions at which the turbine flow path were half closed and fully opened, respectively. Methods of CFD were used to simulate the exhaust flow and they complemented the experimental study by providing greater insight into the details of the flow field and a means of verifying the experimental results. Results indicated that the flow structure was complicated because the two exhaust jet streams interacted with each other during the exhaust system mode transition. The exhaust system thrust coefficient varied from 0.9288 to 0.9657 during the process. The CFD simulation results agree well with the experimental data, which demonstrated that the CFD methods were effective in evaluating the aerodynamic performance of the TBCC exhaust system during the mode transition.

References

1.
Marshall
,
A. W.
,
Gupta
,
A. K.
, and
Lewis
,
M. J.
,
2004
, “
Critical Issues in TBCC Modeling
,”
40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
,
Fort Lauderdale, FL
, July 11–14,
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-3827.10.2514/6.2004-3827
2.
Ketsdever
,
A. D.
,
Yung
,
M. P.
,
Mossman
,
J. B.
, and
Pancotti
,
A. P.
,
2010
, “
Overview of Advanced Concept for Space Access
,”
J. Spacecraft Rockets
,
47
(
2
), pp.
238
249
.10.2514/1.46148
3.
Fry
,
R. S.
,
2004
, “
A Century of Ramjet Propulsion Technology Evolution
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
20
(
1
), pp.
27
58
.10.2514/1.9178
4.
Merlin
,
P. W.
,
2009
, “
Design and Development of the Blackbird: Challenges and Lessons Learned
,”
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
, Orlando, FL, January 5–8,
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-1522.10.2514/6.2009-1522
5.
Moses
,
P. L.
,
Bouchard
,
K. A.
,
Vause
,
R. F.
, and
Pinchney
,
S. Z.
,
1999
, “
An Airbreathing Launch Vehicle Design With Turbine-Based Low-Speed Propulsion and Dual Mode Scramjet High-Speed Propulsion
,”
9th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference
,
Norfolk, VA
, November 1–5,
AIAA
Paper No. 1999-4948.10.2514/6.1999-4948
6.
Javaid
,
K. H.
, and
Serghides
,
V. C.
,
2005
, “
Thrust-Matching Requirements for the Conceptual Design of Hypersonic Waverider Vehicles
,”
J. Aircraft
,
42
(
4
), pp.
1055
1064
.10.2514/1.8729
7.
McDaniel
,
J. C.
,
Chelliah
,
H.
, and
Goyne
,
C. P.
,
2009
, “
US National Center for Hypersonic Combined Cycle Propulsion: An Overview
,”
16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference
,
Bremen, Germany
, October 19–22,
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-7280.10.2514/6.2009-7280
8.
Slater
,
J. W.
, and
Saunders
,
J. D.
,
2009
, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Hypersonic Turbine-Based Combined-Cycle (TBCC) Inlet Mode Transition
,”
16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference
,
Bremen, Germany
, October 19–22,
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-7349.10.2514/6.2009-7349
9.
Dusa
,
D. J.
,
1989
, “
Exhaust Nozzle System Design Considerations for Turboramjet Propulsion Systems
,”
ISABE Paper No. 89-7077
.
10.
Chang
,
I.
, and
Hunter
,
L. G.
,
1994
, “
Over-Under Nozzle CFD Study and Comparison With Data
,”
30th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
,
Indianapolis, IN
, June 27–29,
AIAA
Paper No. 1994-2949.10.2514/6.1994-2949
11.
Georgiadis
,
N. J.
,
Walker
,
J. F.
, and
Trefny
,
C. J.
,
1998
, “
Parametric Studies of the Ejector Process Within a Turbine-Based Combined-Cycle Propulsion System
,”
36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
, January 12–15,
AIAA
Paper No. 1998-0936.10.2514/6.1998-0936
12.
Lam
,
D. W.
,
1995
, “
Use of the PARC Code to Estimate the Off-Design Transonic Performance of an Over/Under Turboramjet Nozzle
,”
31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
,
San Diego, CA
, July 10–12,
AIAA
Paper No. 95-2616.10.2514/6.1995-2616
13.
Gamble
,
E.
, and
Haid
,
D.
,
2004
, “
Improving Off-Design Nozzle Performance Using Fluidic Injection
,”
42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
, January 5–8,
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-1206.10.2514/6.2004-1206
14.
Beylich
,
A. E.
,
1996
, “
Performance of a Hypersonic Twin-Nozzle System
,”
AIAA J.
,
34
(
5
), pp.
953
960
.10.2514/3.13173
15.
Krammer
,
P.
,
Hietmeir
,
F.
,
Bissinger
,
N.
, and
Voss
,
N.
,
1993
, “
German Hypersonics Technology Program, Propulsion Technology-Status 1993
,”
5th AIAA and DGLR International Aerospace Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference
,
Munich, Germany
, November 30–December 3,
AIAA
Paper No. 1993-5094.10.2514/6.1993-5094
16.
Hirschel
,
E. H.
,
1991
, “
Aerothermodynamics and Propulsion Integration in the Sänger Technology Programme
,”
AIAA Third International Aerospace Planes Conference
,
Orlando, FL
, December 3–5,
AIAA
Paper No. 91-5041.10.2514/6.1991-5041
17.
Berens
,
T.
,
1995
, “
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Two-Duct Nozzle/Afterbody Model at Supersonic Mach Numbers
,”
6th AIAA International Aerospace Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference
,
Chattanooga, TN
, April 3–7,
AIAA
Paper No. 1995-6085.10.2514/6.1995-6085
18.
Espinosa
,
A. M.
,
2003
, “
Implications of Turbine Integration for Hypersonic Airbreathing Vehicles
,”
39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
, Huntsville, AL, July 20–23,
AIAA
Paper No. 2003-4408.10.2514/6.2003-4408
19.
Gramble
,
E. J.
, and
Haid
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Hydraulic and Kinematic System Model for TBCC Dynamic Simulation
,”
46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
, Nashville, TN, July 25–28,
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-6641.10.2514/6.2010-6641
20.
Mo
,
J.
,
Xu
,
J.
,
Li
,
C.
, and
Zhang
,
K.
,
2009
, “
The Design and Numerical Study of the Over-Under TBCC Exhaust System
,”
45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit
, Denver, CO, August 2–5,
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-5300.10.2514/6.2009-5300
21.
Palmer
,
J. L.
, and
Hanson
,
R. K.
,
1998
, “
Application of Method of Characteristics to Underexpanded Freejet Flows With Vibrational Nonequilibrium
,”
AIAA J.
,
36
(
2
), pp.
193
200
.10.2514/2.7501
22.
Li
,
N.
,
Zhang
,
K. Y.
, and
Xu
,
J. L.
,
2004
, “
Simulation and Validation of Single-Expansion-Ramp-Nozzle
,”
J. Aerosp. Power
,
19
(
6
), pp.
802
805
, (in Chinese).
23.
de Feo
,
D. M.
,
Qin
,
N.
, and
Birch
,
T. J.
,
2010
, “
A MUSCL and WENO-PNS Approach for Vortex Dominated Flowfields
,”
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
, Orlando, FL, January 4–7,
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-503.10.2514/6.2010-503
24.
Fluent, Inc.
,
1998
,
FLUENT 5 User's Guide
, Vol.
2
,
Fluent Inc. Lebanon, NH
, http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/23583.
You do not currently have access to this content.