In this paper, an advanced zero emission plant using oxy-fuel combustion is presented and compared with a reference plant (a) without CO2 capture and (b) with CO2 capture via chemical absorption. A variation of the oxy-fuel plant with a lower CO2 capture percentage (85%) is also presented, in order to (1) evaluate the influence of CO2 capture on the overall performance and cost of the plant and (2) enable comparison at the plant-level with the conventional method for CO2 capture: chemical absorption with monoethanolamine. Selected results of an advanced exergetic analysis are also briefly presented to provide an overview of further development of evaluation methodologies, as well as deeper insight into power plant design. When compared with the reference case, the oxy-fuel plants with 100% and 85% CO2 captures suffer only a relatively small decrease in efficiency, essentially due to their more efficient combustion processes that make up for the additional thermodynamic inefficiencies and energy requirements. Investment cost estimates show that the membrane used for the oxygen production in the oxy-fuel plants is the most expensive component. If less expensive materials can be used for the mixed conducting membrane reactor used in the plants, the overall plant expenditures can be significantly reduced. Using the results of the exergoeconomic analysis, the components with the higher influence on the overall plant are revealed and possible changes to improve the plants are suggested. Design modifications that can lead to further decreases in the costs of electricity and CO2 capture, are discussed in detail. Overall, the calculated cost of electricity and the cost of avoided CO2 from the oxy-fuel plants are calculated to be competitive with those of chemical absorption.

1.
Anderson
,
R.
,
MacAdam
,
S.
,
Viteri
,
F.
,
Davies
,
D.
,
Downs
,
J.
, and
Paliszewski
,
A.
, 2008, “
Adapting Gas Turbines to Zero Emission Oxy-Fuel Power Plants
,”
ASME
Paper No. G2008-51377.
2.
Wilkinson
,
M.
,
Simmonds
,
M.
,
Allam
,
R.
, and
White
,
V.
, 2003, “
Oxyfuel Conversion of Heaters and Boilers for CO2 Capture
,”
Second National Conference on Carbon Sequestration
, Washington, DC.
3.
Kvamsdal
,
H. M.
,
Jordal
,
K.
, and
Bolland
,
O.
, 2007, “
A Quantitative Comparison of Gas Turbine Cycles With CO2 Capture
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
32
(
1
), pp.
10
24
.
4.
Sundkvist
,
S. G.
,
Griffin
,
T.
, and
Thorshaug
,
N. P.
, 2001, “
AZEP—Development of an Integrated Air Separation Membrane—Gas Turbine
,”
Second Nordic Minisymposium on CO2 Capture and Storage
, Göteborg, Sweden.
5.
Griffin
,
T.
,
Sundkvist
,
S. G.
,
Asen
,
K.
, and
Bruun
,
T.
, 2005, “
Advanced Zero Emissions Gas Turbine Power Plant
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
127
, pp.
81
85
.
6.
Moeller
,
B.
,
Torisson
,
T.
,
Assadi
,
M.
,
Sundkvist
,
S. G.
, and
Asen
,
K. I.
, 2006, “
AZEP Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Power Plants—Thermo-Economic Analysis
,”
Int. J. Thermodyn.
1301-9724,
9
, pp.
21
28
.
7.
Sundkvist
,
S. G.
,
Julsrud
,
S.
,
Vigeland
,
B.
,
Naas
,
T.
,
Budd
,
M.
,
Leistner
,
H.
, and
Winkler
,
D.
, 2007, “
Development and Testing of AZEP Reactor Components
,”
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
,
1
, pp.
180
187
.
8.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, 1999, “
Design Optimization Using Exergoeconomics
,”
Thermodynamic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems
,
A.
Bejan
and
E.
Mamut
, eds.,
Kluwer Academic
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
101
117
.
9.
Bejan
,
A.
,
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, and
Moran
,
M.
, 1996,
Thermal Design and Optimization
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
10.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, and
Cziesla
,
F.
, 2004,
Six Articles Published in Topic “Energy” in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
,
EOLSS
,
UK
.
11.
Lazzaretto
,
A.
, and
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, 2006, “
SPECO: A Systematic and General Methodology for Calculating Efficiencies and Costs in Thermal Systems
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
31
(
8–9
), pp.
1257
1289
.
12.
2000, “
Evaluation of Innovative Fossil Fuel Power Plants With CO2 Removal
,” U.S. DOE—Office of Fossil Energy, Germantown, MD and U.S. DOE/NETL, Pittsburgh, PA, Technical Report No. 1000316 EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.
13.
Framer
,
R.
, 2006,
Gas Turbine World 2006 Handbook
,
Pequot
,
Fairfield, CT
.
14.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
,
Tawfik
,
T.
, and
Lin
,
L.
, 1990, “
Assessment of Coal Gasification/Hot Gas Cleanup Based Advanced Gas Turbine Systems, Exergetic and Thermoeconomic Evaluation
,” Final Report subsmited to Southern Company Services and U.S. DOE, Project No. DE_FC21_89MC26019, Center for Electric Power, Tennessee Technological University.
15.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, and
Winhold
,
M.
, 1984, “
Thermoeconomic Analysis of Power Plants
,” EPRI, Palo Alto, Final Report No. AP-3651, Research Project No. 2029-8.
16.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
,
Lin
,
L.
,
Pisa
,
J.
, and
Tawfik
,
T.
, 1991, “
Thermoeconomic Design Optimization of a KRW-Based IGCC Power Plant
,” Final Report submitted to Southern Company Services and U.S. DOE, Project No. DE-FC21-89MC26019, Center for Electric Power, Tennessee Technological University.
17.
Turton
,
R.
,
Bailie
,
R. C.
,
Whiting
,
W. B.
, and
Shaeiwitz
,
J. A.
, 2002,
Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes
, 2nd ed.,
Prentice-Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
18.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, and
Cziesla
,
F.
, 2002, “
Thermoeconomics
,”
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology
, 3rd ed.,
Academic
,
USA
, Vol.
16
, pp.
659
680
.
21.
Eisermann
,
W.
,
Hasberg
,
W.
, and
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, 1984, “
THESIS - Ein Rechnerprogramm zur Simulation und Entwicklung von Energieumwandlungsanlagen
,
Brennstoff Wärme Kraft
,
36
(
1/2
), pp.
45
51
.
22.
Petrakopoulou
,
F.
,
Boyano
,
A.
,
Cabrera
,
M.
, and
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, 2010, “
Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of a Combined Cycle Power Plant With Chemical Looping Technology
,”
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
, in press.
23.
Rubin
,
E. S.
, and
Rao
,
A. B.
, 2002, “
A Technical, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Amine-Based CO2 Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control
,” U.S. DOE/NETL, Technical Report No. DOE/DE-FC26-00NT40935.
24.
Morosuk
,
T.
, and
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
, 2008, “
How to Calculate the Parts of Exergy Destruction in an Advanced Exergetic Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems
, Cracow-Gliwice,
A.
Ziebik
,
Z.
Kolenda
, and
W.
Stanek
, eds., pp.
185
194
.
You do not currently have access to this content.