An experimental investigation was conducted to examine the behavior of swirling supercritical hydrocarbon fuel (SCF) jets injected into nitrogen environments whose temperatures and pressures exceeded the fuel critical values. Measurements of jet full-cone angle, mass concentration field, and penetration length were made using a schlieren system; the images were captured by a high-speed digital camera and processed using the camera’s software, plus MATLAB codes. Test parameters were the internal geometry of the pressure-swirl nozzle, fuel flow rate, and density ratio. The density ratio was varied by altering the reduced temperature of the injected fluid and nitrogen environment. SCF injections were studied at reduced temperatures (Tjet/Tcrit with both reported in Kelvin) ranging between 1.01 and 1.10, a reduced pressure (pjet/pcrit with both reported in bars) of 1.05, and fuel flowrates of 1.0 g/s, 2.0 g/s, and 3.0 g/s. The variable internal geometry pressure-swirl atomizer produced jets having swirl numbers (SN) of 0 (straight bore), 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 (high swirl). As expected, increasing the swirl number for a SCF jet had by far the largest effect on jet cone angle, followed by a change in the density ratio; changing the fuel flow rate had very little effect. The SCF jet penetration length increased when either the fuel flow rate or density ratio increased. The mass concentration profiles demonstrated the jets to be self-similar in nature, and correlation to a Gaussian profile showed the mass concentration field to be independent of swirl number, density ratio, and fuel flow rate. Finally, it was found that there was a linear relationship between the jet half-width and the swirl number. The current study characterized the behavior of swirling hydrocarbon fuel SCF jets for the first time. Aspects of jet behavior similar to that of gas jets include: Gaussian mass concentration profiles and jet boundaries that scale with swirl number. Finally, CO2 was found to be a suitable surrogate fluid for hydrocarbon fuels since the behavior of the hydrocarbon SCF jets was similar to that of CO2 SCF jets.

1.
Doungthip
,
T.
,
Ervin
,
J.
,
Williams
,
T.
, and
Bento
,
J.
, 2002, “
Studies of Injection of Jet Fuel at Supercritical Conditions
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
41
, pp.
5856
5866
.
2.
Zeaton
,
G.
, 2004, “
An Experimental Study of Supercritical Fluid Jets
,” MS thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
3.
Wu
,
P. K.
, and
Chen
,
T. H.
, 1996, “
Injection of Supercritical Ethylene in Nitrogen
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
12
(
4
), pp.
770
777
.
4.
Briggs
,
E.
, 2005, “
Comparative Study of Prolytic Coking of JP-8 and JP-10 on Inconnel and Stainless Steel Surfaces
,” MS thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
5.
Syred
,
N.
,
Gupta
,
A. K.
, and
Beer
,
J. M.
, 1954, “
Temperature and Density Gradient Changes Arising With the Precessing Vortex Core and Vortex Breakdown in Swirl Burners
,”
Fifteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion
, pp.
587
597
.
6.
Beer
,
J. M.
, and
Chigier
,
N. A.
, 1972,
Combustion Aerodynamics
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
7.
Settles
,
G. S.
, 2001,
Schlieren and Shadowgraph Techniques
,
Springer
,
New York
.
8.
Keagy
,
W. R.
, and
Ellis
,
H. H.
, 1949, “
The Application of the Schlieren Method to the Quantitative Measurement of Mixing Gases in Jets
,”
Third Symposium on Combustion and Flame and Explosion Phenomena
, pp.
667
674
.
9.
Dodge
,
L. G.
, and
Biaglow
,
J. A.
, 1986, “
Effect of Elevated Temperature and Pressure on Sprays From Simplex Swirl Atomizers
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
108
, pp.
209
215
.
10.
Jang
,
C.
,
Bae
,
C.
, and
Choi
,
C.
, 2000, “
Characterization of Prototype High-Pressure Swirl Injector Nozzles, Part I: Prototype Development and Initial Characterization of Sprays
,”
Atomization Sprays
1044-5110,
10
, pp.
159
178
.
11.
Kline
,
S. J.
, and
McClintock
,
F. A.
, 1953, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng.
0025-6501,
75
, pp.
3
9
.
12.
Guildenbecher
,
D. R.
,
Rachedi
,
R. R.
, and
Sojka
,
P. E.
, 2006, “
Pressure Scaling of Pressure Swirl Atomizers
,”
Proceedings of IMECE2006: 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
, Nov. 11–15.
13.
Ortman
,
J.
, and
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
, 1985, “
Fuel Distributions From Pressure-Swirl Atomizers
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
1
(
1
), pp.
11
15
.
14.
Turns
,
S. R.
, 1996,
An Introduction to Combustion
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
15.
Chen
,
L.
, 1994, “
Heat Transfer, Fouling, and Combustion of Supercritical Fuels
,” Defense Technical Information Center, Technical Report No. 940321.
You do not currently have access to this content.