The prospects of reduced NOx emission, improved efficiency, stable, and oscillation-free combustion, and reduced construction costs achieved by an “Inverted Brayton Cycle” applied to midsize (0.5 to 5.0 MWe) power plants are discussed. In this cycle, the combustion products of an atmospheric pressure combustor are expanded in the gas turbine to subatmospheric pressure and following heat extraction are compressed back to slightly above the atmospheric, sufficient to enable a controlled fraction of the exhaust gas to be recirculated to the combustor. Due to the larger volume flow rate of the gas, the polytropic efficiency of both the turbine and compressor of this small machine is increased. Because of the low operating pressure and flue gas recirculation, both of which are instrumental to low NOx formation, the combustor can be operated in the diffusion flame mode; this, on the other hand, assures good flame stability and oscillation-free combustion over wide ranges of the operating variables. For the task of obtaining very low NOx formation, the well-tested multi annular swirl burner (MASB) is chosen. Recent computational and experimental development of the MASB by Siemens-Westinghouse as a topping combustor is discussed. It is shown that the MASB operated in rich-quench-lean mode is capable of single-digit NOx emission. The emissions are further lowered in the APGC by ambient pressure combustion, and by the injection of the recirculated gas in the quench zone of the combustor. Results of a computational optimization study of the ambient pressure gas turbine cycle (APGC) are presented.

1.
Vermes, G., and Bee´r, J. M., 2001, “Ambient Pressure Gas Turbine System,” U.S. Patent No. 6,298,654 B1, Oct. 9.
2.
Vermes, G., 1990, “TG 15 Alternative Fuels Combustor Development,” Textron-Lycoming Report MO. 071390GV1.
3.
Wilson, D. G., 1984, The Design of High Efficiency Turbomachinery and Gas Turbines, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4.
Hung, W. S. Y., 1995, “An Experimentally Verified NOx Emission Model for Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME Paper No. 75-GT-71.
5.
Toof
,
J. L.
,
1986
, “
A Model for the Prediction of Thermal, Prompt, and Fuel NOx Emission From Combustion Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
108
, pp.
340
347
.
6.
Bee´r, J. M., 1989, British Patent No. 45652/65 (1965); U.S. Patent No. 4,845.940.
7.
Lew
,
H. G.
,
DeCorso
,
S. M.
,
Vermes
,
G.
,
Carl
,
D.
,
Havener
,
W. J.
,
Schwab
,
J.
, and
Notardonato
,
J.
, 1982, “Low NOx and Fuel Flexible Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 104.
8.
Garland, R. V., Pillsbury, P. W., and Dowdy, T. E., 1991, “Design and Test of Candidate Topping Combustor for Second Generation PFB Applications,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-113.
9.
Domeracki, W. F., Dowdy, T. E., and Bachovchin, D. M., 1995, “Topping Combustor Status for Second Generation Pressurized Fluid Bed Cycle Application,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-106.
10.
Bee´r, J. M., Dowdy, T. E., and Bachovchin, D. M., 1997, U.S. Patent No. 5636510.
11.
Domeracki, W. F., Dowdy, T. E., and Bachovchin, D. M., 1994, “Status of Topping Combustor Development for Second Generation Pressurized Fluid Bed Cycles,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-176.
12.
Kee, R. J., Rupley, F. M., and Miller J. A., 1989, “CHEMKIN II,” Sandia Report SAND 89-8009, U.S. D.O.E. Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA.
13.
Moorman, R. J., and Long, C. H., 1973, “Design, Development and testing of a Swirl Type Gas Burner With Fuel Gas Recirculation for NOx Control,” ASME 73-PWR-21, pp. 1–9.
14.
Thermoflow, 1999, a thermal engineering software, Thermoflow, Inc., Sudbury, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.