The partially averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) approach is a bridging closure model intended for any level of resolution between the Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) method and direct numerical simulations. In this paper, the proposed closure model is validated in the flow past a square cylinder. The desired ratio of the modeled-to-resolved scales in the PANS closure is achieved by appropriately specifying two bridging parameters: the ratios of unresolved-to-total kinetic energy (fk) dissipation (fε). PANS calculations of different bridging parameter values are performed and the results are compared with experimental data and large-eddy simulations. The Strouhal number(St), mean/root-mean-square (RMS) drag coefficient (CD), RMS lift coefficient (CL), mean velocity profiles, and various turbulent stresses are investigated. The results gradually improve from the RANS level of accuracy to a close agreement with the experimental results with decreasing value of the bridging parameter fk. Overall, the results indicate that the PANS method clearly satisfies the basic tenets of a bridging model: (i) provides a meaningful turbulence closure at any modeled-to-resolved scale ratio and (ii) yields improved accuracy with increasing resolution (decreasing modeled-to-resolved ratio).

1.
Song
,
C.
, and
Park
,
S.
, 2009, “
Numerical Simulation of Flow Past a Square Cylinder Using Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes Model
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
97
(
1
), pp.
37
47
. See also: Jeong, E. H., 2003, “Selected Problems in Turbulence Theory and Modeling,” Ph.D. thesis, Aerospace Engineering Department, Texas A&M University.
2.
Frendi
,
A.
,
Tosh
,
A.
, and
Girimaji
,
S.
, 2007, “
Flow Past a Backward-Facing Step: Comparison of PANS, DES and URANS Results With Experiments
,”
International Journal of Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics
,
8
(
1
), pp.
23
38
.
3.
Tosh
,
A.
,
Frendi
,
A.
, and
Girimaji
,
S.
, 2005, “
Partially Averaged Navier–Stokes: A New Turbulence Model for Unsteady Flows With Application to Acoustics
,”
The 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
, Monterey, CA, Paper No. AIAA 2005-2987.
4.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, 2000, “
Trends in Turbulence Treatments
,”
Fluids 2000
, Denver, CO, Paper No. AIAA 2000-2306.
5.
Khorrami
,
M. R.
,
Singer
,
B.
, and
Berkman
,
M. E.
, 2002, “
Time Accurate Simulations and Acoustic Analysis of Slat Free Shear Layer
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
40
(
7
), pp.
1284
1291
.
6.
Batten
,
P.
,
Goldberg
,
U.
, and
Chakravarthy
,
S.
, 2002, “
LNS—An Approach Towards Embedded LES
,”
The 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, Reno, NV, Paper No. AIAA 2002-0427.
7.
Speziale
,
C. G.
, 1996,
Computing Non-Equilibrium Flows With Time-Dependant RANS and VLES
, 15th ed.,
ICNMFD
,
Monterey, CA
.
8.
Girimaji
,
S. S.
, 2006, “
Partially-Averaged Navier–Stokes Method for Turbulence: A Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes to Direct Numerical Simulation Bridging Method
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
73
(
3
), pp.
413
421
.
9.
Girimaji
,
S. S.
,
Jeong
,
E.
, and
Srinivasan
,
R.
, 2006, “
PANS Method for Turbulence: Fixed Point Analysis and Comparison With URANS
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
73
(
3
), pp.
422
429
.
10.
Abdol-Hamid
,
K. S.
, and
Girimaji
,
S. S.
, 2004, “
A Two-Stage Procedure Toward the Efficient Implementation of PANS and Other Hybrid Turbulence Models
,” Report No. NASA/TM 2004-213260.
11.
Rodi
,
W.
,
Ferziger
,
J.
,
Breuer
,
M.
, and
Pourquie
,
M.
, 1997, “
Status of Large Eddy Simulation: Result of Workshop
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
119
, pp.
248
262
.
12.
Voke
,
P. R.
, 1997, “
Flow Past Square Cylinder: Test Case LES2
,”
ERCOFTAC Series: Direct and Large Eddy Simulation II
,
J. P. C.
Challet
,
P.
Voke
, and
L.
Kleiser
, eds.,
Kluwer Academic
,
Dordrecht
.
13.
Sohankar
,
A.
, and
Davidson
,
L.
, 2000, “
Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Past a Square Cylinder: Comparison of Different Subgrid Scale Models
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
122
, pp.
39
47
.
14.
Germano
,
M.
, 1992, “
Turbulence: The Filtering Approach
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
238
, pp.
325
336
.
15.
Norberg
,
C.
, 1993, “
Flow Around Rectangular Cylinders: Pressure Forces and Wake Frequencies
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
49
, pp.
187
196
.
16.
Lakshmipathy
,
S.
, and
Girimaji
,
S. S.
, 2007, “
Extension of Boussinessq Turbulence Constitutive Relation for Bridging Models
,”
J. Turbul.
1468-5248,
8
(
31
), pp.
1
27
.
17.
McLean
,
I.
, and
Gartshore
,
I.
, 1992, “
Spanwise Correlations of Pressure on a Rigid Square Section Cylinder
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
41–44
, pp.
779
808
.
18.
Bearman
,
P. W.
, and
Obasaju
,
E. D.
, 1982, “
An Experimental Study of Pressure Fluctuations on Fixed and Oscillating Square-Section Cylinders
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
119
, pp.
297
321
.
19.
Luo
,
S. C.
,
Yazdani
,
M. G.
,
Chew
,
Y. T.
, and
Lee
,
T. S.
, 1994, “
Effects of Incidence and Afterbody Shape on Flow Past Bluff Cylinders
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
53
, pp.
375
399
.
20.
Durão
,
D. F. G.
,
Heitor
,
M. V.
, and
Pereira
,
J. C. F.
, 1988, “
Measurements of Turbulent and Periodic Flows Around a Square Cross-Section Cylinder
,”
Exp. Fluids
0723-4864,
6
, pp.
298
304
.
21.
Lyn
,
D. A.
,
Einav
,
S.
,
Rodi
,
W.
, and
Park
,
J. H.
, 1995, “
A Laser-Doppler Velocimetry Study of the Ensemble-Averaged Characteristics of the Turbulent Near Wake of a Square Cylinder
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
304
, pp.
285
319
.
22.
Franke
,
R.
, and
Rodi
,
W.
, 1991, “
Calculation of Vortex Shedding Past a Square Cylinder With Various Turbulence Models
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
23.
Murakami
,
S.
, and
Mochida
,
A.
, 1995, “
On Turbulent Vortex Shedding Flow Past 2D Square Cylinder Predicted by CFD
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
54–55
, pp.
191
211
.
24.
Rodi
,
W.
, 1997, “
Comparison of LES and RANS Calculation of the Flow Around Bluff Bodies
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
69–71
, pp.
55
75
.
You do not currently have access to this content.