A moving-deforming grid study was carried out using a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver, FLUENT® 6.2.16. The goal was to quantify the level of mixing of a lower-viscosity additive (at a mass concentration below 10%) into a higher-viscosity process fluid for a large-scale metering gear pump configuration typical in plastics manufacturing. Second-order upwinding and bounded central differencing schemes were used to reduce numerical diffusion. A maximum solver progression rate of 0.0003 revolutions per time step was required for an accurate solution. Fluid properties, additive feed arrangement, pump scale, and pump speed were systematically studied for their effects on mixing. For each additive feed arrangement studied, the additive was fed in individual stream(s) into the pump-intake. Pump intake additive variability, in terms of coefficient of spatial variation (COV), was >300% for all cases. The model indicated that the pump discharge additive COV ranged from 45% for a single centerline additive feed stream to 5.5% for multiple additive feed streams. It was found that viscous heating and thermal/shear-thinning characteristics in the process fluid slightly improved mixing, reducing the outlet COV to 3.2% for the multiple feed-stream case. The outlet COV fell to 2.0% for a half-scale arrangement with similar physics. Lastly, it was found that if the smaller unit’s speed were halved, the outlet COV was reduced to 1.5%.

1.
Kramer
,
W.
, 1988, “
Gear Pump Characteristics and Application
,”
Plastics South—Conference Proceedings of SPE
,
SPE
,
Atlanta
, pp.
91
110
.
2.
Bouse
,
L. F.
,
Carlton
,
J. B.
, and
Jank
,
P. C.
, 1988, “
Effect of Water Soluble Polymers on Spray Droplet Size
,”
Trans. ASAE
0001-2351,
31
(
6
), pp.
1633
1648
.
3.
Valsamis
,
L. N.
, and
Pereira
,
J. M.
, 1999, “
Rotor Developments in the Farrel Continuous Mixers Post Reactor Processing of Bimodal HDPE Resins
,”
Proc. of 1999 International Conference on POLYOLEFINS XI
,
SPE
,
Houston
, pp.
233
248
.
4.
Bruce
,
D.
,
Wilson
,
M.
, and
Generalis
,
S.
, 1997, “
Flow Field Analysis of Both the Trilobal Element and Mixing Disc Zones Within a Closely Intermeshing, Co-Rotating Twin-Screw Extruder
,”
Intern. Polymer Processing XII
,
Hanser Publishers
,
Munich
, Vol.
4
, pp.
323
330
.
5.
Heniche
,
M.
,
Tanguy
,
P.
,
Reeder
,
M.
, and
Fasano
,
J.
, 2005, “
Numerical Investigation of Blade Shape in Static Mixing
,”
AIChE J.
0001-1541,
51
, pp.
44
58
.
6.
Aris
,
R.
, 1962,
Vectors, Tensors, and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanis
,
Dover
,
New York
.
7.
Panton
,
R. L.
, 1996,
Incompressible Flow
, 2nd ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
8.
Siginer
,
D. A.
, and
Letelier
,
M. F.
, 2002, “
Pulsating Flow Flow of Viscoelastic Fluids in Straight Tubes of Arbitrary Cross-Section, Part II: Secondary Flows
,”
Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.
0020-7462,
37
, pp.
395
407
.
9.
Bird
,
R. B.
,
Steward
,
W. E.
, and
Lightfoot
,
E. N.
, 1960,
Transport Phenomena
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
10.
Strasser
,
W. S.
,
Feldman
,
G. M.
,
Wilkins
,
F. C.
, and
Leylek
,
J. H.
, 2004, “
Transonic Passage Turbine Blade Tip Clearance With Scalloped Shroud: Part II—Losses With and Without Scrubbing Effects in Engine Configuration
,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2004-59116.
11.
Musad
,
A.
, and
Khurram
,
R.
, 2005, “
A Multiscale Finite Element Method for Fluid-Structure Interaction
,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2005-79767.
12.
Hulme
,
I.
,
Clavelle
,
E.
,
van der Lee
,
L.
, and
Kantzas
,
A.
, 2005, “
CFD Modeling and Validation of Bubble Properties for a Bubbling Fluidized Bed
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
44
, pp.
4254
4266
.
13.
FLUENT
, 2005,
FLUENT 6.2 User’s Guide
,
FLUENT, Inc.
,
Lebanon, NH
.
14.
Patankar
,
S. V.
, 1980,
Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow
,
Taylor & Francis
,
New York
.
15.
Tezduyar
,
T. E.
, and
Senga
,
M.
, 2005, “
Comparison of Some New and Old Stabilization and Shock-Capturing Parameters in SUPG Fine Element Computation of Inviscid Compressible Flows With Quadrilateral and Triangular Elements
,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2005-80969.
You do not currently have access to this content.