Flat-plate turbulent boundary layer measurements have been made on painted surfaces, smoothed by sanding. The measurements were conducted in a closed return water tunnel, over a momentum thickness Reynolds number Reθ range of 3000 to 16,000, using a two-component laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV). The mean velocity and Reynolds stress profiles are compared with those for smooth and sandgrain rough walls. The results indicate an increase in the boundary layer thickness (δ) and the integral length scales for the unsanded, painted surface compared to a smooth wall. More significant increases in these parameters, as well as the skin-friction coefficient Cf were observed for the sandgrain surfaces. The sanded surfaces behave similarly to the smooth wall for these boundary layer parameters. The roughness functions ΔU+ for the sanded surfaces measured in this study agree within their uncertainty with previous results obtained using towing tank tests and similarity law analysis. The present results indicate that the mean profiles for all of the surfaces collapse well in velocity defect form. The Reynolds stresses also show good collapse in the overlap and outer regions of the boundary layer when normalized with the wall shear stress.

1.
Clauser
,
F. H.
,
1954
, “
Turbulent Boundary Layers in Adverse Pressure Gradients
,”
J. Aeronaut. Sci.
,
21
, pp.
91
108
.
2.
Hama
,
F. R.
, 1954, “Boundary-Layer Characteristics for Rough and Smooth Surfaces,” Transactions SNAME, 62, pp. 333–351.
3.
Ligrani
,
P. M.
, and
Moffat
,
R. J.
,
1986
, “
Structure of Transitionally Rough and Fully Rough Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
162
, pp.
69
98
.
4.
Krogstad
,
P.-A˚.
,
Antonia
,
R. A.
, and
Browne
,
L. W. B.
,
1992
, “
Comparison Between Rough- and Smooth-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
245
, pp.
599
617
.
5.
Krogstad
,
P.-A˚.
, and
Antonia
,
R. A.
,
1999
, “
Surface Roughness Effects in Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
27
, pp.
450
460
.
6.
Antonia
,
R. A.
, and
Krogstad
,
P.-A˚.
,
2001
, “
Turbulence Structure in Boundary Layers Over Different Types of Surface Roughness
,”
Fluid Dyn. Res.
,
28
, pp.
139
157
.
7.
Raupach
,
M. R.
,
Antonia
,
R. A.
, and
Rajagopalan
,
S.
,
1991
, “
Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
,
44
(
1
), pp.
1
25
.
8.
Acharya
,
M.
,
Bornstein
,
J.
, and
Escudier
,
M. P.
,
1986
, “
Turbulent Boundary Layers on Rough Surfaces
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
4
, pp.
33
47
.
9.
Schultz
,
M. P.
,
2002
, “
The Relationship Between Frictional Resistance and Roughness for Surfaces Smoothed by Sanding
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
124
, pp.
492
499
.
10.
Townsend, A. A., 1976, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11.
Perry
,
A. E.
, and
Li
,
J. D.
,
1990
, “
Experimental Support for the Attached-Eddy Hypothesis in Zero-Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
218
, pp.
405
438
.
12.
Schultz
,
M. P.
,
2000
, “
Turbulent Boundary Layers on Surfaces Covered with Filamentous Algae
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
357
363
.
13.
Klebanoff, P. S., and Diehl, F. W., 1951, “Some Features of Artifically Thickened Fully Developed Turbulent Boundary Layers With Zero Pressure Gradient,” NACA TN 2475.
14.
Lewthwaite
,
J. C.
,
Molland
,
A. F.
, and
Thomas
,
K. W.
, 1985, “An Investigation into the Variation of Ship Skin Frictional Resistance with Fouling,” Transactions Royal Institute of Naval Architects, 127, pp. 269–284.
15.
Moffat
,
R. J.
,
1988
, “
Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
,
1
, pp.
3
17
.
16.
Coleman
,
H. W.
, and
Steele
,
W. G.
,
1995
, “
Engineering Application of Experimental Uncertainty Analysis
,”
AIAA J.
,
33
(
10
), pp.
1888
1896
.
17.
Edwards
,
R. V.
,
1987
, “
Report of the Special Panel on Statistical Particle Bias Problems in Laser Anemometry
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
109
, pp.
89
93
.
18.
Buchhave
,
P.
,
George
,
W. K.
, and
Lumley
,
J. L.
,
1979
, “
The Measurement of Turbulence With the Laser-Doppler Anemometer
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
11
, pp.
443
503
.
19.
Durst
,
F.
,
Fischer
,
M.
,
Jovanovic
,
J.
, and
Kikura
,
H.
,
1998
, “
Methods to Set Up and Investigate Low Reynolds Number, Fully Developed Turbulent Plane Channel Flows
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
120
, pp.
496
503
.
20.
Coles, D., 1962, “The Turbulent Boundary Layer in a Compressible Fluid,” The Rand Corp., Report R-403-PR.
21.
DeGraaff
,
D. B.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2000
, “
Reynolds-Number Scaling of the Flat-Plate Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
422
, pp.
319
346
.
22.
Colebrook
,
C. F.
, 1939, “Turbulent Flow in Pipes With Particular Reference to the Transition Between Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws,” Journal of Civil Engineers, 11, pp. 133–157.
23.
Grigson
,
C. W. B.
,
1992
, “
Drag Losses of New Ships Caused by Hull Finish
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
36
, pp.
182
196
.
24.
Nikuradse, J., 1933, “Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes,” NACA Technical Memorandum 1292.
25.
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
26.
Granville
,
P. S.
,
1987
, “
Three Indirect Methods for the Drag Characterization of Arbitrarily Rough Surfaces on Flat Plates
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
31
, pp.
70
77
.
27.
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
1988
, “
Direct Simulation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer up to Reθ=1410,
J. Fluid Mech.
,
187
, pp.
61
98
.
You do not currently have access to this content.