Surfactant-enhanced washing of oil-based drill cuttings was evaluated as a technology of benefit to domestic oil producers. Laboratory studies showed the branched C14-C15 alcohol propoxylate sulfate to be a promising surfactant for liberating oils from these drill cuttings. Low concentrations ( by weight) of this surfactant produced ultra-low oil-water interfacial tensions (IFTs), thereby allowing the rollup/snap-off mechanisms to liberate drilling oil (C16, C18 alpha olefins) from the cuttings. Surfactant-enhanced washing was compared between oil-based drill cuttings, Canadian River Alluvium (CRA), and silica, showing that the hydrophobic nature of the oil-based cuttings limited the amount of oil removed. The content of the cuttings promoted surfactant abstraction by the cuttings, thereby increasing the hydrophobicity and oil retention by the cuttings. For this reason, three components were added to produce a robust system: (1) branched C14-C15 alcohol propoxylate sulfate, (2) octyl-sulfobetaine, and (3) builder . The builder was added to promote sequestration, thereby decreasing the available for precipitating the surfactant. The octyl-sulfobetaine helps mitigate high hardness and high hydrophobicity by acting as a lime soap dispersing agent (LSDA). Surfactant losses were minimized and oil removal was maximized by using all three components. When washing with this three-component formulation, oil removal was relatively independent of operating conditions such as bath-cuttings contact time and agitation energy; minimizing the contact time and agitation has the added benefit of reducing the fines production during washing operations. When washing with the three-component formulation, the oil was liberated from the cuttings as a free phase layer, sans surfactant and sans solids. The final (post washing) oil content of oil-based cuttings was in the range of 2% to 5%, which is below treatment standards for these cuttings. In addition, greater than 85% of the initial branched C14-C15 alcohol propoxylate sulfate remained in the bath after washing, which minimizes the need for make-up surfactant when the wash water is reused.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2005
Technical Papers
Surfactant-Enhanced Treatment of Oil-Based Drill Cuttings
Jeffrey D. Childs,
Jeffrey D. Childs
School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Search for other works by this author on:
Edgar Acosta,
Edgar Acosta
School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Search for other works by this author on:
John F. Scamehorn,
John F. Scamehorn
School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, The Institute of Applied Surfactant Research (IASR), University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Search for other works by this author on:
David A. Sabatini
David A. Sabatini
School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, The Institute for Applied Surfactant Research (IASR), University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Ok Iahoma 73019 Phone: (405) 329-1648, FAX: (405) 325-4217
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey D. Childs
School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Edgar Acosta
School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
John F. Scamehorn
School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, The Institute of Applied Surfactant Research (IASR), University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
David A. Sabatini
School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, The Institute for Applied Surfactant Research (IASR), University of Oklahoma
, Norman, Ok Iahoma 73019 Phone: (405) 329-1648, FAX: (405) 325-4217 J. Energy Resour. Technol. Jun 2005, 127(2): 153-162 (10 pages)
Published Online: June 15, 2004
Article history
Received:
April 15, 2003
Revised:
June 15, 2004
Citation
Childs, J. D., Acosta, E., Scamehorn, J. F., and Sabatini, D. A. (June 15, 2004). "Surfactant-Enhanced Treatment of Oil-Based Drill Cuttings." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. June 2005; 127(2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1879044
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Modeling and Measurement of the Dynamic Surface Tension of Surfactant Solutions
J. Fluids Eng (August,2008)
Thermal and Concentrational Maragoni Convection at Liquid∕Air Bubble Interface
J. Appl. Mech (January,2006)
Erratum: “Sodium Silicate Based Thermal Interface Material for High Thermal Contact Conductances” [ASME J. Electron. Packag., 122 , No. 2, pp. 128–131]
J. Electron. Packag (June,2001)
Additive Adsorption and Interfacial Characteristics of Nucleate Pool Boiling in Aqueous Surfactant Solutions
J. Heat Transfer (July,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Interactive Surface Chemistry Studies of Methyl Elster Adjuvants and Selected Targets Yield a New Methodology to Guide Formulators
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 16th Volume
Evaluation of Some Adjuvants for Improving Glyphosate Efficacy
Pesticide Formulations and Delivery Systems: The Continued Evolution of Agrochemicals, 24th Volume
Basic Principles and Current Treatments
Medical Devices for Respiratory Dysfunction: Principles and Modeling of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)