Analytical and numerical investigations into the dynamics and control of dive-plane dynamics of supercavitating vehicles are presented. Dominant nonlinearities associated with planing forces are taken into account in the model. Two controllers are proposed to realize stable inner-loop dynamics, a linear state feedback control scheme and a switching control scheme. Through numerical simulations and estimation of the region of attraction, it is shown that effective feedback schemes can be constructed. In comparison to existing control schemes, the feedback schemes proposed in this work can stabilize a supercavitating vehicle with a large region of attraction around the trim condition instead of just stabilization around the limit cycle motion. In particular, the achieved stability is robust to modeling errors in the planing force. This robustness is especially important for supercavitating vehicles because the underlying planing force physics is complicated and not yet fully understood. Compared to the linear feedback control scheme, the switching control scheme is seen to increase the region of attraction with reduced control effort, which can be useful for avoiding saturation in magnitude. Analytical tools, including the describing function method and the circle criterion, are applied to facilitate understanding of the closed-loop system dynamics and assist in the controller design. This work provides a basis for interpreting the tail-slap phenomenon of a supercavitating body as a limit cycle motion and for developing control methods to achieve stable inner-loop dynamics in the full model.

1.
Dzielski
,
J.
, and
Kurdila
,
A.
, 2003, “
A Benchmark Control Problem for Supercavitating Vehicles and an Initial Investigation of Solutions
,”
J. Vib. Control
1077-5463,
9
(
7
), pp.
791
804
.
2.
Kirschner
,
I.
,
Kring
,
D. C.
,
Stokes
,
A. W.
,
Fine
,
N. E.
, and
Uhlman
,
J. S.
, 2002, “
Control Strategies for Supercavitating Vehicles
,”
J. Vib. Control
1077-5463,
8
, pp.
219
242
.
3.
Lin
,
G.
,
Balachandran
,
B.
, and
Abed
,
E. H.
, 2004, “
Dynamics and Control of Supercavitating Bodies
,”
Proceedings of ASME IMECE 2004
, Anaheim, ASME Paper No. IMECE 2004-59959,
ASME, New York
.
4.
Kulkarni
,
S. S.
, and
Pratap
,
R.
, 2000, “
Studies on the Dynamics of a Supercavitating Projectile
,”
Appl. Math. Model.
0307-904X,
24
, pp.
113
129
.
5.
Choi
,
J.
,
Ruzzene
,
M.
, and
Bauchau
,
O. A.
, 2004, “
Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Supercavitating Vehicles Using Modal Based Elements
,”
Simulation
0037-5497,
80
, pp.
619
633
.
6.
Logvinovich
,
G. V.
, 1980, “
Some Problems in Planing Surfaces
,” Trudy TsAGI, No. 2052.
7.
Tesi
,
A.
,
Abed
,
E. H.
,
Genesio
,
R.
, and
Wang
,
H.-O.
, 1996, “
Harmonic Balance Analysis of Period-Doubling Bifurcations With Implications for Control of Nonlinear Dynamics
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
32
(
9
), pp.
1255
1271
.
8.
Gelb
,
A.
, and
Velde
,
W. E. V.
, 1968,
Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
9.
Khalil
,
H.
, 1996,
Nonlinear Systems
, 2nd ed.,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, Chap. 10.
10.
Logvinovich
,
G. V.
, 1972,
Hydrodynamics of Free-Boundary Flows
, translated from Russian (NASA-TT-F-658),
U.S. Department of Commerce
,
Washington, DC
.
11.
Rugh
,
W. J.
, 1996,
Linear System Theory
, 2nd ed.,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, Chap. 9.
12.
Kautsky
,
J.
, and
Nichols
,
N. K.
, 1985, “
Robust Pole Assignment in Linear State Feedback
,”
Int. J. Control
0020-7179,
41
, pp.
1129
1155
.
13.
Liberzon
,
D.
, 2003,
Switching in Systems and Control
,
Birkhauser
,
Boston
.
14.
Hu
,
T.
, and
Lin
,
Z.
, 2001,
Control Systems with Actuator Saturation
,
Birkhauser
,
Boston
.
You do not currently have access to this content.