The competition to deliver fuel efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles is driving the automotive industry to consider even more complex powertrain systems. Adequate performance of these new highly interactive systems can no longer be obtained through traditional approaches, which are intensive in hardware use and final control software calibration. This paper explores the use of Dynamic Programming to make model-based design decisions for a lean burn, direct injection spark ignition engine, in combination with a three way catalyst and an additional three-way catalyst, often referred to as a lean NOX trap. The primary contribution is the development of a very rapid method to evaluate the tradeoffs in fuel economy and emissions for this novel powertrain system, as a function of design parameters and controller structure, over a standard emission test cycle.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
dynamic programming, internal combustion engines, air pollution control, state-space methods, interpolation
Topics:
Calibration, Corporate average fuel economy, Cycles, Dynamic programming, Emissions, Engines, Fuel efficiency, Nitrogen oxides, Optimization, Vehicles, Direct injection spark ignition engines, Storage, Fuels, Oxygen, Temperature, Interpolation, Gears, Stress
1.
Heywood, J. B., 1988, Internal Combustion Engine, McGraw-Hill, NY.
2.
Brogan, M. S., Brisley, R. J., Walker, A. P., Webster, D. E., Boegner, W., Fekete, N. P., Kra¨mer, M., Krutzsch, B., and Voigtla¨nder, D., 1995, “Evaluation of NOX Storage Catalyst as an Effective System for NOX Removal from the Exhaust Gas of Leanburn Gasoline Engines,” SAE Paper No. 952490.
3.
Fekete, N. P., Kemmler, R., Voigtla¨nder, D., Krutzsch, B., Zimmer, E., and Wenninger, G., Strehlau, W., van den Tillaart, J. A. A., Leyrer, J., Lox, E. S., and Mu¨ller, W., 1997, “Evaluation of NOX Storage Catalyst for Lean Burn Gasoline Fueled Passenger Cars,” SAE Paper No. 970746.
4.
Wang, Y., Raman, S., and Grizzle, J. W., 1999, “Lean NOX Trap Modeling for Lean Burn Engine Control,” Proc. of 1999 American Control Conference.
5.
Brandt, E. P., 1998, “Modeling and Diagnostics of Three-way Catalysts for Advanced Emissions Control Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
6.
Brandt, E. P., Wang, Y., and Grizzle, J. W., “Dynamic Modeling of a Three-Way Catalyst for SI Engine Exhaust Emission Control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, to appear.
7.
Sun, J., Kolmanovsky, I., Brehob, D., Cook, J. A., Buckland, J., and Haghgooie, M., 1999, “Modeling and Control of Gasoline Direct Injection Stratified Charge (DISC) Engines,” Proc. of 1999 IEEE Conference on Control Applications.
8.
Bertsekas, D. P., 1995, Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Athena Scientific.
9.
de Madrid, A. P., Dormido, S., and Morilla, F., 1999, “Reduction of the Dimensionality of Dynamic Programming: A Case Study,” Proc. of 1999 American Control Conference.
10.
Kolmanovsky, I., van Nieuwstadt, M., and Sun, J., 1999, “Optimization of Complex Powertrain systems for Fuel Economy and Emissions,” Proc. of 1999 IEEE Conference on Control Applications.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.