This paper compares the lateral stability and steady-state curving performance of radial and conventional rail vehicle trucks. The radial truck has two unique features, it allows direct elastic coupling between the wheelsets and it allows greater total truck shear stiffness for a given bending stiffness. It is shown that the first property allows the radial truck to achieve up to a 40 percent higher critical speed than the conventional truck for equivalent truck total shear and bending stiffness since the direct coupling between the wheelsets allows decoupling of the truck mass from the hunting wheelset masses. The second feature, i.e., greater shear stiffness capability, allows the radial truck to have improved wear properties during the negotiation of tight curves. It is shown that the high shear stiffness property combined with a low bending stiffness reduces the lateral flange force and wheelset angle of attack during flange contact. It is concluded that for routes where the majority of curves are less than 4 deg (greater than 400 m radius) the truck optimized for off-flange performance should have intermediate values of shear stiffness, bending stiffness, and conicity. On the other hand, for routes where the majority of curves are greater than 4 deg, the truck optimized for on-flange performance should have a high shear stiffness and low values of bending stiffness and conicity.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 1981
Research Papers
A Comparison of the Stability and Curving Performance of Radial and Conventional Rail Vehicle Trucks
D. Horak,
D. Horak
M.I.T. Vehicle Dynamics Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
C. E. Bell,
C. E. Bell
M.I.T. Vehicle Dynamics Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
J. K. Hedrick
J. K. Hedrick
Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Horak
M.I.T. Vehicle Dynamics Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
C. E. Bell
M.I.T. Vehicle Dynamics Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
J. K. Hedrick
Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass. 02139
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Sep 1981, 103(3): 191-200 (10 pages)
Published Online: September 1, 1981
Article history
Received:
May 18, 1981
Online:
July 21, 2009
Citation
Horak, D., Bell, C. E., and Hedrick, J. K. (September 1, 1981). "A Comparison of the Stability and Curving Performance of Radial and Conventional Rail Vehicle Trucks." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. September 1981; 103(3): 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3140629
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Modeling and Control of a 3-DOF planar Cable-Driven Parallel Robot with Flexible Cables
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Error Estimation Method for Optimal Control Using Direct Collocation
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Motion Control Along Spatial Curves for Robot Manipulators: A Non-Inertial Frame Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
A Case Study Comparing Both Stochastic and Worst-Case Robust Control Co-Design Under Different Control Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Related Articles
Stability and Curving Mechanics of Rail Vehicles
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,1981)
Nonlinear Wheelset Forces in Flange Contact—Part 2: Measurements Using Dynamically Scaled Models
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,1979)
Influence of Nonlinear Wheel/Rail Contact Geometry on Stability of Rail Vehicles
J. Eng. Ind (February,1977)
Lateral Stability Behavior of Railway Freight Car System With Elasto-Damper Coupled Wheelset: Part 1—Wheelset Model
J. Mech., Trans., and Automation (December,1987)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction and Getting Started
Natural Negotiation for Engineers and Technical Professionals
Arm Yourself with the Tools
Natural Negotiation for Engineers and Technical Professionals
Communication and Timing
Natural Negotiation for Engineers and Technical Professionals