Abstract

Ballistic shields are used by military and police members in dangerous situations to protect the user against threats such as gunfire. When struck, the shield material deforms to absorb the incoming kinetic energy of the projectile. If the rapid back-face deformation contacts the arm, it can potentially impart a large force, leading to injury risk, termed behind armor blunt trauma (BABT). This work characterized the loading profiles due to the contact between the deforming back-face of the shield and the arm using a modified upper extremity anthropomorphic test device (ATD). This ATD measured forces at the hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow to compare the locational effects of the force transfer for future investigations of fracture risk. Two composite ballistic shields, both with the same ballistic protection rating, were investigated and had statistically different responses to the same impact conditions, indicating a further need for shield safety evaluation. Additionally, ballistic force curves were compared among stand-off distances, defined as the distance between the back-face of the shield and the front of the force sensor, where the peak impact force significantly decreased with increased stand-off. This study presents the first highly instrumented ATD upper limb capable of evaluating BABT and characterization of these loading profiles. This work demonstrates the importance of realistic boundary conditions as loading varies by anatomical location. Stand-off distance is an effective method to reduce loading and should be considered in future shield design iterations and standards that are developed using this device.

References

1.
Cannon
,
L.
,
2001
, “
Behind Armour Blunt Trauma - An Emerging Problem
,”
J. R. Army Med. Corps
,
147
(
1
), pp.
87
96
.10.1136/jramc-147-01-09
2.
National Institute of Justice
,
1985
, “
Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials
,” NIJ, Washington, DC, Standard No. 0108.01.
3.
Bolduc
,
M.
,
Binette
,
J.
,
Fisher
,
D.
, and
Hammond
,
D.
,
2018
, “
Tactical Ballistic Shields Operational Testing Protocol Definition
,”
Personal Armour Systems Symposium
, Washington, DC, Oct. 3, p. 92.
4.
National Institute of Justice
,
2008
, “
Ballistic Resistance of Body Armour
,” NIJ, Washington, DC, Standard No. 0101.06.
5.
Bass
,
C.
,
Salzar
,
R.
,
Lucas
,
S.
,
Davis
,
M.
,
Donnellan
,
L.
,
Folk
,
B.
,
Sanderson
,
E.
, and
Waclawik
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Injury Risk in Behind Armor Blunt Thoracic Trauma
,”
Int. J. Occup. Safety Ergon.
,
12
(
4
), pp.
429
422
.10.1080/10803548.2006.11076702
6.
Hanlon
,
E.
, and
Gillich
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Origin of the 44-mm Behind-Armor Blunt Trauma Standard
,”
Milit. Med.
,
177
(
3
), pp.
333
339
.10.7205/MILMED-D-11-00303
7.
Bolduc
,
M.
, and
Anctil
,
B.
,
2010
, “
Improved Test Methods for Better Protection: A BABT Protocol Proposal for STANAG 2920
,”
Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS)
, QC, Canada, Sept.
13
17
.
8.
Cronin
,
D.
,
2012
, “
Application of a Detailed Thorax Model to Investigate Behind Armour Blunt Trauma
,”
IRCOBI Conference Proceedings (No. IRC-12-92)
, Dublin, Ireland, Sept.
12
14
.http://www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc12/pdf_files/92.pdf
9.
Hewins
,
K.
,
Anctil
,
B.
,
Stojsih
,
S.
, and
Bir
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Ballistic Blunt Trauma Assessment Methodology Validation
,”
Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS)
, Europa-Allee, Nuremberg, Sept.
17
21
.https://www.biokinetics.com/images/stories/Hewins_2012.pdf
10.
Lucuta
,
V.
,
2014
, “
Ballistic Limit and Dynamic Back-Face Deformation fo Helmet Shell Composite Materials and Corresponding Deformation of the Projectiles
,”
Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS)
, Cambridge, UK, Sept.
8
12
.
11.
Weisenbach
,
C.
,
Logsdon
,
K.
,
Salzar
,
R.
,
Chancey
,
V.
, and
Brozoski
,
F.
,
2018
, “
Preliminary Investigation of Skull Fracture Patterns Using an Impactor Representative of Helmet Back-Face Deformation
,”
Milit. Med.
,
183
(
suppl_1
), pp.
287
293
.10.1093/milmed/usx210
12.
Anctil
,
B.
,
Bourget
,
D.
,
Pageau
,
G.
,
Rice
,
K.
, and
Lesko
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Evaluation of Impact Force Measurement Systems for Assessing Behind Armour Blunt Trauma for Undefeated Ballistic Helmets
,”
Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS)
, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, Sept.
7
10
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304380221_Evaluation_of_impact_force_measurement_systems_for_assessing_behind_Armour_blunt_trauma_for_undefeated_ballistic_helmets
13.
Rafaels
,
K.
,
Cutcliffe
,
H.
,
Salzar
,
R.
,
Davis
,
M.
,
Boggess
,
B.
,
Bush
,
B.
,
Harris
,
R.
,
Rountree
,
M.
,
Sanderson
,
E.
,
Campman
,
S.
,
Koch
,
S.
, and
Bass
,
C.
,
2015
, “
Injuries of the Head From Backface Deformation of Ballistic Protective Helmets Under Ballistic Impact
,”
J. Foren. Sci.
,
60
(
1
), pp.
219
225
.10.1111/1556-4029.12570
14.
Matheis
,
E.
,
Eidsmore
,
A.
, and
Rafaels
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Ballistic Factors of Behind Helmet Blunt Trauma Skull Fracture
,”
31st Annual Symposium on Ballistics
, Hyderabad, India, Nov.
4
8
.10.12783/ballistics2019/33275
15.
Freitas
,
C.
,
Mathis
,
J.
,
Scott
,
N.
,
Bigger
,
R.
, and
MacKiewicz
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Dynamic Response Due to Behind Helmet Blunt Trauma Measured With a Human Head Surrogate
,”
Int. J. Med. Sci.
,
11
(
5
), pp.
409
425
.10.7150/ijms.8079
16.
Gordon
,
C. C.
,
Churchill
,
T.
,
Clauser
,
C. E.
,
Bradtmiller
,
B.
,
McConville
,
J. T.
,
Tebbetts
,
I.
, and
Walker
,
R. A.
,
1989
,
Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Summary Statistics, Interim Report for 1988
,
Anthropology Research Project
,
Yellow Srings, OH
.
17.
Garrett
,
J.
,
1971
, “
The Adult Human Hand: Some Antopometric and Biomechanical Considerations
,”
Human Factors
,
13
(
2
), pp.
117
131
.10.1177/001872087101300204
18.
PCB Piezotronics
,
2019
, “
Piezoelectric Force Rings
,” Amphenol Corporation, Depew, NY, accessed July 20, 2021, https://www.pcb.com/contentstore/MktgContent/LinkedDocuments/Force-Torque/TM-FRC-Dynamic-Force_Lowres.pdf
19.
Chakravarty
,
A.
,
Martinez
,
A.
, and
Quenneville
,
C.
,
2017
, “
The Injury Tolerance of the Tibia Under Off-Axis Impact Loading
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
,
45
(
6
), pp.
1534
1542
.10.1007/s10439-017-1824-6
20.
Martinez
,
A.
,
Chakravarty
,
A.
, and
Quenneville
,
C.
,
2018
, “
The Effect of Impact Duration on the Axial Fracture Tolerance of the Isolated Tibia During Automotive and Military Impacts
,”
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
,
78
, pp.
315
320
.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.013
21.
NATO,
2006
, “
Procedures for Evaluating the Protection Level of Logistic and Light Armoured Vehicles
,”
Allied Engineering Publication
, Vol.
2
, Brussels, Belgium, AEP-55.
22.
Rhule
,
D.
,
Rhule
,
H.
, and
Donnelly
,
B.
,
2005
, “
The Process of Evaluation and Documentation of Crash Test Dummies for Part 572 of the Code of Federal Regulations
,” 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, DC, June 6–9, Paper No.
05–0284
.http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-01/esv/esv19/05-0284-W.pdf
23.
Pintar
,
F.
, and
Yoganandan
,
N.
,
2002
, “
Dynamic Bending Tolerance of the Human Forearm
,”
Traffic Injury Prev.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
43
48
.10.1080/15389580210520
24.
Duma
,
S.
,
Boggess
,
B.
,
Crandall
,
J.
, and
MacMahon
,
C.
,
2003
, “
Injury Risk Function for the Small Female Wrist in Axial Loading
,”
Accid. Anal. Prev
,
35
(
6
), pp.
869
875
.10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00092-1
25.
Griffin
,
L.
,
Harris
,
R.
,
Hayda
,
R.
, and
Rountree
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Loading Rate and Torsional Moments Predict Pilon Fractures for Antipersonnel Blast Mine Loading
,”
IRCOBI Conference Proceedings
.http://www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc0111/2001/Session2/2.4.pdf
26.
Carpanen
,
D.
,
Kedgley
,
A. E.
,
Shah
,
D. S.
,
Edwards
,
D. S.
,
Plant
,
D. J.
, and
Masouros
,
S. D.
,
2019
, “
Injury Risk of Interphalangeal and Metacarpophalangeal Joints Under Impact Loading
,”
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
,
97
, pp.
306
311
.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.037
You do not currently have access to this content.