The validity of the cumulant-neglect closure method is examined by applying it to a system for which an exact solution is available. A comparison of the results indicates that the Gaussian closure technique usually leads to a mean-square versus excitation strength curve which follows the same general shape as that of the exact solution but has substantial errors in some cases. The 4th order cumulant-neglect method is found to be inapplicable and to predict erroneous behavior for systems in certain parameter ranges, including a faulty prediction of a jump in response as the excitation varies through a certain critical value. On the other hand, for systems in other ranges the 4th order cumulant-neglect closure method predicts the mean square response quite well. These two parameter ranges are delineated in the paper. The 6th order cumulant-neglect closure method is also examined, leading to similar conclusions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 1987
Research Papers
Cumulant-Neglect Closure Method for Nonlinear Systems Under Random Excitations
Jian-Qiao Sun,
Jian-Qiao Sun
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Search for other works by this author on:
C. S. Hsu
C. S. Hsu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Search for other works by this author on:
Jian-Qiao Sun
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
C. S. Hsu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
J. Appl. Mech. Sep 1987, 54(3): 649-655 (7 pages)
Published Online: September 1, 1987
Article history
Received:
September 17, 1986
Revised:
December 31, 1986
Online:
July 21, 2009
Citation
Sun, J., and Hsu, C. S. (September 1, 1987). "Cumulant-Neglect Closure Method for Nonlinear Systems Under Random Excitations." ASME. J. Appl. Mech. September 1987; 54(3): 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3173083
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Modified Path Integral Solution of Fokker–Planck Equation: Response and Bifurcation of Nonlinear Systems
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam (January,2010)
Parametric Uncertainty and Random Excitation in Energy Harvesting Dynamic Vibration Absorber
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2021)
Three-Dimensional Dynamic Formation Control of Multi-Agent Systems Using Rigid Graphs
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (November,2015)
Vibration of Nonlinear Systems Under Additive and Multiplicative Random Excitations
Appl. Mech. Rev (November,1989)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Random Turbulence Excitation in Single-Phase Flow
Flow-Induced Vibration Handbook for Nuclear and Process Equipment
A Study of the Influence of Facial Landmark Mislocalization on Automatic Age Estimation System
International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering, 3rd (ICSTE 2011)
Errors in Automated Pavement Surface Distress Data Collection
Surface Characteristics of Roadways: International Research and Technologies